15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHClassic line insurance
Leading reported evidence
Use classic line
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used Classic Line for a couple of years on my SC until it was destroyed by an engine fire(!).
Leading evidence: 'Use classic line' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check small print' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Use hagerty who have been first class......reasonable and brilliant
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I use Hagerty who have been first class......reasonable and brilliant to deal with.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
All this is fine for me, but worth checking the small print.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm insured by them for the second year running now.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I now use Locktons through the PCGB scheme which I have to say is excellent, although not the cheapest quote you can find.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm in my second year with them. Their premium was the best last year and again this year with agreed value and a sensible excess. Good policy too with track day cover (although I think there's an exclusion or two), Breakdown cover and Europe etc.
Having changed plates a couple of times, they seem very efficient too.
One thing to note is that you do not accrue any no claims bonus with their classic policy.
Yeah they're great.
Those, mannings (free track cover) and Matt at Henderson Taylor are my top 3.
My car is currently just on my multicar policy with admiral but I'll insure it agreed value next year as it's evolving quite a bit now.
5th year with classic line
All mods decalred in fine detail.....cost since becoming a 9eXX is £900 pa and agreed value
Cant complain, very happy with their pricing and communications etc
I've not had to claim or anything but no complaints thus far. Switched to them when Mannings (who I'd been with for aeons) premiums became distinctly uncompetitive.
I have two modified 'modern classics' including the 997 with Classicline, I have had policies with them for 5+ years and likewise have never had to claim but the service/ quotes etc have been 1st class.
If you join Tipec you save between 10 and 15% on premiums as well. I joined Tipec for 2 yrs (£60) and saved more than that on one yrs premium.
I have agreed valuations on both cars, costs a bit more but really easy to organise.
All good and I have no intention in going elsewhere unless given a good reason.
Classic Line Experience
I used Classic Line for a couple of years on my SC until it was destroyed by an engine fire(!). Be aware that, as a broker, they deal with the setting up and processing of your policy but if you need to make a claim, they take a step back and pass you onto the actual
insurance
company; which in my case was ERS.
ERS weren't too bad, although they do have the usual number of rude call centre jobsworths you have to fight through. My settlement was less than I wanted, but that was partly my fault for not keeping up to speed with market values, and they didn't fully comply with all of the clauses in the policy but this was somewhat interpretive. In the end I decided to cut my losses and agreed to their offer as I was keen to move on and get into a replacement car.
I now use Locktons through the PCGB scheme which I have to say is excellent, although not the cheapest quote you can find. As with much in life, going for the cheapest option is not always the best course of action long term....
HTH
MF.
Can't fault their service and I can walk to their office living local which is a small bonus , however one thing to note in the conditions for my car is that it must be garaged overnight and not left on my drive which is in a private cul de sac when it's at my home address which can be a pain sometimes . Ironically it's covered if I park it on the local pub car park ? Work that out
Went with them 2 months ago, got an agreed value of 33,500 for my c4s, I put that in thinking they might puch back on but they agreed straightaway with no hassle
I was planning on doing this as well - however, how do you (or I) go about valuing our cars? I can tot up what I have spent, less the maintenance, but that doesn't strike me as a very robust way of valuing the car.
Ideas?
I'm insured by them for the second year running now. Easily the cheapest quote. Not sure whether it's common for all their policies but they couldn't do drive other
car insurance
and basically have my car down as a 'second car" so I can't build no claims and the max mileage is 7500 a year. All this is fine for me, but worth checking the small print.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
