fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

ID this Porsche 911 - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
8 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHID this Porsche 911 - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Install with earlier bumpers

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I’m going with later shell fitted with earlier bumpers on the basis of how ‘Neat’ the rear window fit is.

ID this Porsche 911 - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I’m going with later shell fitted with earlier bumpers on the basis of how ‘Neat’ the rear window fit is.

ID this Porsche 911 - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Install with earlier bumpers' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install with earlier bumpers' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 8 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Install with earlier bumpers

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I’m going with later shell fitted with earlier bumpers on the basis of how ‘Neat’ the rear window fit is.

ID this Porsche 911 - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I’m going with later shell fitted with earlier bumpers on the basis of how ‘Neat’ the rear window fit is.

ID this Porsche 911 - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T025149Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Local bodyshop popped this on FB this week as a recently completed full respray amongst other work, for a bit of fun anybody want to have a go and ID it?

POST 3Original post

The mirror shape is 1974 onwards but they were early impact bumper cars ... this presents as pre-impact (pre 1973) so which bit is modified ? The wheels look after market so I would say it's a 2.7 or possibly a 3.0litre ? 'Stands up to be knocked down

POST 4Original post

ChrisW. said: The mirror shape is 1974 onwards but they were early impact bumper cars ... this presents as pre-impact (pre 1973) so which bit is modified ? The wheels look after market so I would say it's a 2.7 or possibly a 3.0litre ? 'Stands up to be knocked down I’m going with later shell fitted with earlier bumpers on the basis of how ‘Neat’ the rear window fit is. It looks a lot baggier on earlier cars

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Some of you aren't far off, one of the rear:

POST 6Original post

bobthemonkey said: ChrisW. said: The mirror shape is 1974 onwards but they were early impact bumper cars ... this presents as pre-impact (pre 1973) so which bit is modified ? The wheels look after market so I would say it's a 2.7 or possibly a 3.0litre ? 'Stands up to be knocked down I’m going with later shell fitted with earlier bumpers on the basis of how ‘Neat’ the rear window fit is. It looks a lot baggier on earlier cars The Pre '65 ? cars had plastic rear windows ...

POST 7Original post

ChrisW. said: The mirror shape is 1974 onwards but they were early impact bumper cars ... this presents as pre-impact (pre 1973) so which bit is modified ? The wheels look after market so I would say it's a 2.7 or possibly a 3.0litre ? 'Stands up to be knocked down The Carrera 3.0 had wider arches, being a narrow body body, it’s a 2.7. I recon it’s a ‘77 2.7 that’s been backdated

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Well you all pretty much got there one way or another, for those of you on fb, here's the linky: https://www.facebook.com/Allan-Perry-Garages-Ltd-1... 70s car with front/rear end metalwork and cosmetics backdated to early 60s. No affiliation, i just follow them as they resprayed my 996 and did a great job.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.