13 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIs there an easy way to remove the Stone Guards
Leading reported evidence
Use fingernail
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
All I did was use my fingernail to lift up the top-most edge of the film, and then slowly pulled the film away from the body.
Leading evidence: 'Use fingernail' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set i made quite a few times' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
+1 on the hair dryer - that's what I used when I replaced mine.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have reused the one set I made quite a few times...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
before I took them off I traced the pattern and used that as a stencil, then made some using 3m clear bra material...when I go to the track or longer trip I’ll stick them on...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Then just use some isopropyl alcohol on a soft cloth to remove any remaining glue or gunk.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
before I took them off I traced the pattern and used that as a stencil, then made some using 3m clear bra material...when I go to the track or longer trip I’ll stick them on...
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T083035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So I just got my first
Porsche
,
Cayman S
07. But the stone guards look like they had better days. They are faded and cracked. Is there an easy way to remove them without scratching the paint?????? Thanks in advance!
A clothes steamer works really well to soften them up and then you can peel them off by hand. Then just use some isopropyl alcohol on a soft cloth to remove any remaining glue or gunk.
I removed the stone guards on my 2006
Boxster S
last weekend . All I did was use my fingernail to lift up the top-most edge of the film, and then slowly pulled the film away from the body. There was no residue left on the body from the film when I finished.
FWIW, my 7 yr old stone guards looked awful: marks from road & track debris & discolored. I bought replacements but never got around to putting them on. A couple of weeks ago I detailed my car using Zaino AIO and my Porter Cable buffer. Having nothing to lose I buffed the stone guards with moderate pressure, black pad, #5 speed, & AIO. They now look like new, ... i.e. barely visible on my Seal Grey car. Before replacing them, try a good mildly abrasive cleaner polish and a buffer or lots of elbow grease. You might be pleasantly surprised like I was.
Dan
Sent from my
iPhone
using Tapatalk
+1 on the hair dryer - that's what I used when I replaced mine. New guards from
Suncoast
are relatively inexpensive, and can dress up the look of an older car. I have also found that Meguiar's plastic polish does a pretty good job of cleaning up the majority of scuff marks, but after a few years new guards are probably warranted - a real easy cosmetic improvement!
So I managed to remove the stone guards, a lil bit of heat from my girl's hair dryer, a plastic scraper and tons of precaution. It broke in a million pieces because the previous owner didnt took proper care of it, so glue residue was all around. Did a couple of minutes of research on you tube and saw that it was going to be either WD-40 or goo off to remove it, went with goo off because I had some lying around, either way, it came out pretty easily and after a bit of polishing, it looks good as new! Thanks for the advice!
A few days ago, I too had the "pleasure" of trying to remove the stone guards.
Didn't realise that they were a PITA to remove as Eunos mentioned.
took it to a professional. 2 people took about 90 mins to remove both sides that involved a heat gun, solvents, scrapers, a buffing machine and some old fashioned elbow grease.
on the engine cooling/driver's side (passenger side for the Left hand drive folk) it was cracking even before the attempt to remove it began and that took the bulk of the removal time.
The air intake (on the other side) only took a few mins with the heat gun - not sure why the 2 sides were so different.
in the picture you can see how much progress a novice took in 20 mins.
I took mine off too.. before I took them off I traced the pattern and used that as a stencil, then made some using 3m clear bra material...when I go to the track or longer trip I’ll stick them on... on a freshly waxed car they peel right off.. I have reused the one set I made quite a few times... Food for thought
Removed and replaced them (new ones are black, looks sharp against the white body). No sweat taking the old ones off, still flexible, and being careful while pulling them - they came right off. Minimal glue mess to clean up.
Let's see if I have a photo of the new ones:
Yup.. there we are. I'm thinking of painting the louvers either white or black. I think white might look very sharp..
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.