10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHUK 911 Insurance advice
Leading reported evidence
Use these guys ?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Anyone else used these guys ?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Leading evidence: 'Use these guys ?</strong><hr></blockquote>' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use these guys' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all,
I'm new to this forum but plan to visit regularly with a new 2003 996 Carrera 2 due in November.
To try and save me the runaround, has anyone found good insurance prices from reputable companies in the UK. I've made a few tentative calls and currently the best is around �1000 with �500 xs - Oh and I'm 39 ! (going on 40).
Any tips would be appreciated.
Thanks
Greg
personally i always bump the excess up high as i can (abt 1000-1500 pounds) - basis is that this brings the yearly cost down considerably. most scratches/dings cost mostly under 400-500 pounds which u can pay out of yr own pocket thus protect the no claims and stop premiums rising. then only claim when u have really major prang/theft which fingers crossed comes once every 7-10 years
just my angle on it and is based on not having many claims - not that i am particularly good driver - just dont do much milage and there is very little vandalism/theft here
Have you tried Privlage (0113 3991000). They were the best price for me by far. I pay �1,600 a year which sounds like a lot but I was getting quotes in the region of �3,000 from other providers.
Greg
I was impressed with the service I got from PerformanceMarque in Sutton Coldfield (Lorraine or Joanne). Its worth talking to them. 0121 248 0911.
Best of luck.
I know it sounds silly, but have you tried Tesco? I currently have a policy with them because they do allow higher excesses. I pay around �1200 with �750 excess - I am 31 and have zero NCB....unlimited mileage.
If you are considering limited mileage then I have been quoted about �800 per year up to 5000 miles with Carole Nash.
Both companies on the internet (obviously).
Christer
That sounds a great deal (Do they do 3 for 2?!!).
But it may be that the price reflects your 994 is 12 years old. Greg may find the price significantly higher for a new 996.
Regards.
[quote]Originally posted by Greg P:
<strong>Norwich Union Direct seem to be coming up best at around �1K with �500 XS.
Anyone else used these guys ?</strong><hr></blockquote>
I use them - "�2,000 p.a. with a �750 excess, but that's with zero NCD, but an introductory discount from them anyway. I'm 35.
[quote]Originally posted by dom4471:
<strong>...and there is very little vandalism/theft here</strong><hr></blockquote>
"Here" is Monoco??
The theft rate for Porsche (old & new) is just terrible in the U.K. It is over 10%
every year
. That means that there is a one in ten chance that your car will vanish without recovery each year.
The situation is similar in Belgium where I am thought I don't know the exact number. In one sense it is worse here as we have a lot of car-jackings.
Curious what the insurance rates are like in Monoco. Also curious about how easy it is to register cars there. I might soon need to find a new domain to register my Porsche.
S.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.