PistonHeads

991.2 Turbo mileage depreciation - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH991.2 Turbo mileage depreciation - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Reported or suspected cause

loss of £30k

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause: 1
Suspected cause: 0
Reported fixes

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause
Private sale would mean you'd likely have to list it for a bit less - probably a loss of £30K on the Turbo and £40K on the Turbo S.
Original post Read captured discussion
991.2 Turbo mileage depreciation - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'loss of £30k' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'loss of £30k' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

loss of £30k

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause: 1
Suspected cause: 0
Reported fixes

Read evidence and context

Discussions that suspect a cause: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause
Private sale would mean you'd likely have to list it for a bit less - probably a loss of £30K on the Turbo and £40K on the Turbo S.
Original post Read captured discussion
991.2 Turbo mileage depreciation - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi All, first time poster, please be gentle with me. I've searched a lot on these forums and can't find any opinions on this. I've owned one 911 before, a 991.1 4S so I'm not a Porsche expert by any means. UK based. I find myself in the fortunate position to be in the market for either a 991.2 Turbo or Turbo S coupe. I plan to have the car for 2 years and put about 30,000 miles on it. At my price range I can get a Turbo with about 5,000 miles on the clock or a Turbo S with about 35,000 miles. I don't mind which version I get (Turbo or Turbo S) and I'm not particularly fussed about the spec. I know that whatever model version I find myself owning will be an amazing car and blow my mind daily. My main concern is the depreciation. My budget is around £105k, give or take. Does anyone know which car might lose more value: 991.2 Turbo going from 5,000 miles to 35,000 miles 991.2 Turbo S going from 35,000 miles to 65,000 miles Any advice appreciated! Thanks very much

POST 2Original post

If you buy a plain Turbo you will always regret not buying the Turbo S. Also you will lose more on the Turbo over your mileage profile because it is seven times higher as opposed to roughly only double the mileage on the Turbo S.

POST 3Original post

991.2 Turbo £105K 5,000 miles to £80K 35,000 miles = £25K loss 991.2 Turbo S £105K 35,000 miles to £70K 65,000 miles = £35K loss Those are based on prices through dealers. Private sale would mean you'd likely have to list it for a bit less - probably a loss of £30K on the Turbo and £40K on the Turbo S. Harder sell in two years a Turbo S with +60K miles.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.