10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 3.4 - Cylinder 4 misfire.
Leading reported evidence
Replace plug / coil
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
you have changed the plug / coil but is it actually sparking :?: thinking wiring fault here ..
Leading evidence: 'Replace plug / coil' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check borescore/cracks/valves ok' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
So I would suggest a cylinder leak test to see if compression OK and borescope it to check for borescore/cracks/valves ok.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I will be able to double check when back from work.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Will be a good chance to inspect your fuel rail for corrosion.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I would like to carry out a compression test but do any of you knowledgable people have any suggestions of things to look at or test first before the more intrusive investigations?
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I would like to carry out a compression test but do any of you knowledgable people have any suggestions of things to look at or test first before the more intrusive investigations?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
First post and new owner in the world of Porsche.
Bought a nice example with great history and hoping to get plenty of use out of it however there is a problem to over come first. Isn't there always!!
Started with a flashing CEL which would become a solid CEL then would disappear. This would repeat over the last few days.
Clear misfire and showed to be cylinder 4 from a simple diagnostic machine.
Changed the spark plugs and coils but not fixed the problem, so I'm hoping for some advise on the next steps please. I could send the car off to a specialist of course but am fortunate to have plenty of space a ramp and every tool required to carry out the jobs. Plus I enjoy playing with cars.
I would like to carry out a compression test but do any of you knowledgable people have any suggestions of things to look at or test first before the more intrusive investigations?
Any help appreciated, thanks.
Just to add, when we removed the spark plug from cylinder 4, offside and furthest back to rear of car, you could smell petrol on the end of it and there is a smell of unburnt fuel from the exhaust on that side.
Given you have replaced plugs and coils we would assume the spark is OK, if you smell fuel on it it's probably getting fuel OK, injector faults are relatively rare on the 996 AFAIK, which leaves compression. So I would suggest a cylinder leak test to see if compression OK and borescope it to check for borescore/cracks/valves ok.
Fault code is for a cyl 4 misfire .. you had the eml then it went so im assumeing its an intermitant fault .. that kinda rules out compression as something like a burnt valve would be a permanent fault .. but still worth checking .
Ok so spark , fuel and compression is needed .. you have changed the plug / coil but is it actually sparking :?: thinking wiring fault here ..
Quickest check .. use a spare plug/coil or the old one , plug it into the loom then use a jumper from the plug to the engine to earth it .. pull the fuel pump fuse and get someone to crank it whilst you watch .. is it sparking.
Downside is if its intermitant then you need the fault to be there other wise it will just look fine .
Moveing onto injector . i think i would swop it with another cyl to see if the misfire moves cyl,s .
If both ok you are into a compression check .
Thank you for the quick replies.
I haven't driven a lot since plug change but couple of steady drives and CEL light does appears to go just between flashing and solid now, turned off only once for a short time.
So compression test .... is it a fairly easy strip down to carry out the test?
I would also check what i first mentioned but for a compression check then remove all the plugs , pull the fuel pump fuse then do the check , check every cyl and compaire , cyl 4 should be much lower than the others if its a compression fault ... a failed tappet is possible but i would expect a rattle / knock noise if it was that and you havent mentioned that so far .
Access is not brilliant without a ramp but can be done .
I had a corrado vr6 once with a failed stuck open injector. Worth swapping them round to see if the fault follows (I have no idea how easy this task is).
Will be a good chance to inspect your fuel rail for corrosion.
Demort made a good point, we have assumed spark OK but no proof: pretty simple to get a visual confirmation before you borescope or compression test.
Swopping injector to see if fault moves cylinders Would prove injector OK as again we have only assumed not proven, although I have no idea how difficult that is to do Either..
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.