24 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGT3 engine
Leading reported evidence
Test mule
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Possibly, the factory has done it for a test mule, but no aftermarket tuner has done it other than the Alzen racing team that I know of.
Leading evidence: 'Test mule' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test mule' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The low availability and high demand equals high price (and likely high risk if used).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Centrifugal blowers, like the one RUF uses, dont give that real jolt of power you would want for spending so much $$.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The GT3s, TTs and the new GT2 use the same basic motor, which is the old style v-bottomed motor with
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
24 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T140027Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I had inquired about this at a Porsche tuning shop and was told that the mounting points are different and that our transmissions wont handle the addl. HP. You could rig a new fram for mounting, but would it be as effective...I was also told good luck in getting a GT3 crate engine this decade.
New GT2 Engine
Recent AutoWeek indicates that the next GT2 will produce somewhere between 525 and 550 HP! And will be the first production 911 to break 200 mph. I believe it is Direct Injection.
Now, to fit one of those puppies in a Cayman!
:banana:
http://www.planet-9.com/general-off-topic/13595-gt2-brochure.html
i spoke with ruf. here was the reply i got.... (i paraphrased it a bit)
"not recommended b/c it's very difficult, ecu, mounting pt, gear box, cooling blah blah... but given enough $, yes, it can be done..."
Bigger cojones for my Cayman S
I am very intersted in adding a significant amount of HP to my Cayman S. I'm talking bringing it to a total of 380 hp or more. Who does the best/most reliable job and what is the added performance and cost estimate? Who is 9ff?
They are one of the premier tuners for Porsche. You can do a search here as well as the web. 9ff mods are very nice and very expensive.
9ff Fahrzeugtechnik
It's considerably more than just direct injection - it is basically a juiced-up version of the motor in the 997 twin turbo... different turbos, timing, ECU, exhaust system and boost figures.
The GT3s, TTs and the new GT2 use the same basic motor, which is the old style v-bottomed motor with
real
dry sump and water-cooled heads. The GT3s are normally aspirated. The GT2 motor would be quite a feat to get into the Cayman, for all the reasons stated above, plus you'd need a lot more room for all the plumbing that comes along with it.
brad
stever13, if you are serious about a big power upgrade I think having a conversation with RUF would be a good starting point. They offer both the engine transplant (3.8) as well as the supercharging option so they could probably give you a good cost/benefit analysis on both options. Also, RUF offers warranties on their work.
RUF Automobile Cayman S Conversion
Stever13 and OP; it seems like the 3.8 transplant is the way to go for more power. Stever, there are a few tuners in North America that do the swaps (where are you located?) Personally, I would do the transplant over the RUF blower. Centrifugal blowers, like the one RUF uses, dont give that real jolt of power you would want for spending so much $$. You are looking at about $30K US to perform the swap.
Farnbacher/Loles would also be a good choice. Their GTR Cayman is 400+ hp
Here is a link to all the info for the GTR
http://www.farnbacherloles.com/general/pdf/GTRflyer.pdf
Bigger cojones
thanks for the info everyone. I'm in san francisco. With those kind of price tags $30k+, I'll have to gather some info particularly in reliability.
Thanks again!
If reliability is your priority, then the X-51 transplant would probably serve your purposes the best... if done right, with a brand-new crate motor from Porsche, you'll be able to have it serviced at any Porsche dealer. If I remember correctly, the crate motors from PAG come with a two-year warranty. if you use a shop for the transplant that will give you a warranty on the actual installation process, and the reprogramming of the ECU, etc. then you should be pretty well set.
brad
Ditto! I was there when Charles had his car dyno tested and drove the car. It was a horrible installation and didn't come close to what they had promised. I couldn't believe the mess they had made of his car.
I've got to agree that the bulk of evidence doesn't exactly aid them in their case!
I've got to admit that from what I've read about some of these companies, not just 9ff, there is a lot of alpha testing going on at the expense of the consumer.
Oh well, the alternative is to buy an old 'Stang with a 5.0 and proven aftermarket parts! And did they ever need them!
all I can say is that I have had nothing but good experiences with Farnbacher. They have backed up their products and have true race and track experience for those of us that take our performance mods to the track. You don't win races with knowing what you are doing.
Or, we could all wait maybe 3 years and see what Porsche might have in store for the little Cayman S and base Cayman. I know most folks do not expect much to happen with Porsche's Cayman for a long while, but you never know. The success of the racing Caymans produced by independents might just "force Porsche's hand"!
And a well balanced Porsche version of the Cayman with a modest increase in power (say, 330 hp) would probably be at least just as fast as a tuner version with lots more power and certainly less worrisome, because it would come with a 4 year warranty. Wait, and yee shall see! We are all (and I include myself because I have considered a 3.8L swap) acting like a bunch of spoiled kids with no patience.
A little bird tells me to watch for a test of the RUF 3400 K authored by the same fellow that evaluated the X-51 RUF Boxster in an upcoming issue of "Excellence". Possibly the issue after next.
economics of engine swap
These "engine swap" threads are amusing. Do people honestly think they can get their hands on a high end super car engine for an engine swap into a cheaper car???!! Yes....the supercar engine is likely worth more than the Cayman.
I would not be surprised if resellers requested >$70K for a modern GT2, GT3 or turbo engine that will actually run!
A wrecked
modern
supercar would not be available to just any "Joe/Jane Smith". A person must be willing to pay $$$. A race team could outbid Joe/Jane Smith. The low availability and high demand equals high price (and likely high risk if used).
Want a GT3????.....Get in line to buy a GT3. Best bet IMHO.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.