12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSuspension Refresh Required
Leading reported evidence
Install "as new" coilovers along
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With that in mind I've fitted "as new" coilovers along with any other components showing wear, so in my case, rear coffin arms, 4 droplinks and some elephant racing adjustable front bottom arms.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For a second opinion I took advantage of a January offer at Centre Gravity, where the carry out there suspension health check for £120, and if you then have any subsequent work carried out, the £120 gets knocked off the bill.
Leading evidence: 'Install "as new" coilovers along' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check £120, and if you' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
My issue is that I do not know what needs to be fixed or replaced, e.g.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
replaced my set up not that long ago...had M030 kit from factory so replaced like for like.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For a second opinion I took advantage of a January offer at Centre Gravity, where the carry out there suspension health check for £120, and if you then have any subsequent work carried out, the £120 gets knocked off the bill.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The health check is extremely thorough, inspecting every component, road test and existing geometry measured.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check £120, and if you
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
For a second opinion I took advantage of a January offer at Centre Gravity, where the carry out there suspension health check for £120, and if you then have any subsequent work carried out, the £120 gets knocked off the bill.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
With that in mind I've fitted "as new" coilovers along with any other components showing wear, so in my case, rear coffin arms, 4 droplinks and some elephant racing adjustable front bottom arms.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 1 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All,
I have a 2002 C4S manual, 68,000 miles. It is starting to feel less sharp, and is noisy over small bumps, ribbed surfaces.
I have been reading the OEM vs Ohlins info. I am sure that I would stick at OEM, for my limited skills!
My issue is that I do not know what needs to be fixed or replaced, e.g. coffin arms, ARB's etc.
I live in Herts, is there a good suspension specialist in North London/Herts/Beds? Or do I take it to my Indy?
Thanks
Paul
You could have a chat with JAZ, based in St Albans.
Good outfit and know their stuff.
West London you have Porsche Torque, used and regarded highly by many on here.
replaced my set up not that long ago...had M030 kit from factory so replaced like for like.
You can pick up the full kit including the additional parts you'll need for around £1400 give or take.
Comes with:
front and rear struts and springs
front and rear ABR
front top mount bearings
all the washers, nuts and bolts
bump stops etc.
and if you fancy changing it yourself no additional labour costs :thumb:
⬆ï¸This⬆ï¸
Austrian GP break! Hamilton feeling sorry for himself again!🙄
I've replaced mine with OEM MO30 and the car is tight and well damped. The ride is awesome. Cornering excellent. Potholes easily absorbed. It's firm and does give a thud but the car never unsettles.
I paid £1200 for mine less than a year ago. Labour including one seizure was only £790. Worth every penny.
Ooo Hamilton's just said 'I've gotta get back on it again"🤨
Cheers
BK😉
Chris /Pete at Center Gravity in Atherstone, Warwickshire come well recommended. You'll need s geo in any case and they will check all the components in brakes, steering and suspension and advise what needs replacing. They'll set the geometry as well. They test shock absorbers also in their process. They'll advise you on keeping it stock, Ohlins or Coilovers.
Contact via the web page.
I'm taking mine to centre gravity. They will assess exactly what needs doing from suspension arms to dampers and also set your alignment to what you want from the car. Not cheap but more effective than guessing
I'm also based in Bedfordshire and was told by a local indie specialist that everything needed replacing on my early leggy 996.
As I wasn't really in love with the car at that point I didn't fancy throwing £2.5k at it (in case the result still didn't blow me away).
For a second opinion I took advantage of a January offer at Centre Gravity, where the carry out there suspension health check for £120, and if you then have any subsequent work carried out, the £120 gets knocked off the bill.
The health check is extremely thorough, inspecting every component, road test and existing geometry measured.
Their recommendations was a couple of arms, various bushes, track rod and probably some other bits.
I'm waffling, but their work has transformed the car beyond recognition. Because they just work on Porsche geometry and suspension day in day out their expertise is spot on.
I saved myself a fortune, as I was looking at shocks, springs and other stuff it didn't need.
Now I really like the car and I will take it back to them for further investment in a year or so.
I have a 2000 C4 manual with original suspension and 86,000 miles at purchase. Like yours, it wasn't sharp, creaked and generally handled poorly. It was always on my to-do list to replace the suspension.
In May I took it to Jaz in St. Albans for a complete refresh of the suspension using the OE M030 kit. What a change! Also looks better with the slight drop in ride height.
I am just back from Le Mans and it was a joy to drive there and back :thumbs:
Familair story. I too have heard of people 'guessing' what was needed (and generalist indy's having a guess and advising items and spending unnecessary money on things they did not need.
That is a great way of doing it and definitely the most accurate way of pin pointing what is required.
The only issue I would have with this is buy the time I travel down to centre gravity and back which is 4+ hours each way I'll have spent over £100 in petrol, plus a hotel the night before, plus the labour at CG, then also factor in my time off work.
That adds up to a decent chunk of cash towards some shocks anyway. Plus even if they say the original shocks are ok, they're still 20 year old tech.
With that in mind I've fitted "as new" coilovers along with any other components showing wear, so in my case, rear coffin arms, 4 droplinks and some elephant racing adjustable front bottom arms. I didn't need the latter but am giving them a try anyway instead of my adjustable camber bushed, std arms.
I'll get a base setup sorted up here then make the trip down to CG for their full monty setup.
Just putting another option out there if you live a long way from CG. :thumb:
My car rode fine on 75k mile M030 shocks with newish -30mm springs but a drive of mates car with the KWs I now own was like chalk and cheese. It showed me how far things have come and just how brilliantly a sorted 996 can actually drive. Can't wait to get my mine back on the road.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.