17 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHShouldn't this be illegal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Reported or suspected cause
baby-puke interior
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
It was the baby-puke interior that did it for me....
Shouldn't this be illegal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'baby-puke interior' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'baby-puke interior' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Use cars/porsc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Shouldn't this be illegal? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I find this sort of car fascinating. And I really mean that.
I would love to understand the man maths that caused someone to take what was probably perfectly good Carrera 3.4 and spend an HUGE amount of money on cosmetic changes that yes, to my eyes are "challenging" but I can imagine that some would like it (well maybe).
This must have taken real commitment with new bumpers, THAT wing, new lights, new wheels (yes probably bendy replica Gen 2 997 Turbos) and then got it all painted. And the result, a hideous, almost unsaleable Frankenstein of a car.
You have to love it!
c4sman said:
I find this sort of car fascinating. And I really mean that.
I would love to understand the man maths that caused someone to take what was probably perfectly good Carrera 3.4 and spend an HUGE amount of money on cosmetic changes that yes, to my eyes are "challenging" but I can imagine that some would like it (well maybe).
This must have taken real commitment with new bumpers, THAT wing, new lights, new wheels (yes probably bendy replica Gen 2 997 Turbos) and then got it all painted. And the result, a hideous, almost unsaleable Frankenstein of a car.
You have to love it!
And on a Tip!
"People" don't know the model details across 911s so taking a 911 and glueing on bits of GT2/3/turbo etc together with bespoke bits of tat transform it into something many people may think is a limited racing super "I have huge balls" type of car.
This kind of spend is money well spent for someone who wants to impress people outside the chipshop and pub and who doesn't give a hoot about how fast it goes or if it's fun to drive or not.
Loud exhausts are similar mentality form ahead of function. Most on here wouldn't understand it
supermono said:
"People" don't know the model details across 911s so taking a 911 and glueing on bits of GT2/3/turbo etc together with bespoke bits of tat transform it into something many people may think is a limited racing super "I have huge balls" type of car.
This kind of spend is money well spent for someone who wants to impress people outside the chipshop and pub and who doesn't give a hoot about how fast it goes or if it's fun to drive or not.
Loud exhausts are similar mentality form ahead of function. Most on here wouldn't understand it
I think we all understand it very well! We were all 12 once.
supermono said:
"People" don't know the model details across 911s so taking a 911 and glueing on bits of GT2/3/turbo etc together with bespoke bits of tat transform it into something many people may think is a limited racing super "I have huge balls" type of car.
This kind of spend is money well spent for someone who wants to impress people outside the chipshop and pub and who doesn't give a hoot about how fast it goes or if it's fun to drive or not.
Loud exhausts are similar mentality form ahead of function. Most on here wouldn't understand it
Makes a lot of sense, but still takes a big financial commitment that would allow them to simply buy a more impressive car, but as you say, not as chip shop impressive.
