fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

I really must stop looking...

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHI really must stop looking...

Leading reported evidence

Use anymore

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Then you think of selling a car you've owned for 23 years (that you don't actually use anymore but have just spent ~2k getting right), but the sentimental value keeps it in your garage.

Original post Read captured discussion
I really must stop looking...
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use anymore' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use anymore' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use anymore

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

Then you think of selling a car you've owned for 23 years (that you don't actually use anymore but have just spent ~2k getting right), but the sentimental value keeps it in your garage.

Original post Read captured discussion
I really must stop looking...
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T194705Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

....At things like this: http://www.911virgin.com/porscheforsale/597/997GT3Clubsport/ The man maths calculator is whirring away, need to have a word with myself. :hand: :?: :frustrated:

POST 3Original post

Just buy it, you might not get the opportunity again. You can always sell it if things don't go to plan.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Would involve selling the 996T and the Cossie. Something I'm considering but I think my son would kill me.

POST 6Original post

Love a 97 GT3 plynchy I'd sell the 6T and Cossie if it were me in the scenario Good luck with whatever you decide :thumbs:

POST 7Original post

I did the same change and would recommend in a heart beat to do it again. They are on a totally different level.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

You're really not helping 😄

POST 10Original post

Have a strong word with yourself its a GT3 clubsport :thumb: get it bought

POST 11Original post

Looks good value to me..... :dont know: Get it bought

POST 12Original post

As above, chop them both in. 997 GT3 feels electric compared to 996t and while the Cosworths are old skool cool, how many cars can you drive at once. Get it bought. :thumb:

POST 13Original post

Love it. Great history. You should buy it before someone else does.

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

It's funny, you buy a 911 Turbo a few years ago and think 'that's it, I've peaked'. Then you keep looking at other things, and the doubt starts to creep in :?: Then you think of selling a car you've owned for 23 years (that you don't actually use anymore but have just spent ~2k getting right), but the sentimental value keeps it in your garage. But then having 2 toys makes a lot less sense than 1, and non of the 3 in question is depreciating. If I'm totally honest I'd prefer a comfort spec, but I don't think this is an itch that's going to go away. May take a bit of planning (the 996T did) and months of looking. Is the general consensus re values that the GT3 is still climbing? Damn.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.