fullymatted.
Back to search
986Forum

Do you get this joke? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHDo you get this joke? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

Leading reported evidence

Fill with language designed

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The meme in question was posted in reply to what (I thought) was a post filled with language designed to appear rhetoric, but reads like the author suffers with Wernicke's aphasia.

Original post Read captured discussion
Do you get this joke? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Fill with language designed' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill with language designed' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 12 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Fill with language designed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The meme in question was posted in reply to what (I thought) was a post filled with language designed to appear rhetoric, but reads like the author suffers with Wernicke's aphasia.

Original post Read captured discussion
Do you get this joke? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 986Forum: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Please pick an option if you get this joke without having to Google any of the content. Multiple choices allowed. p.s. pic was posted by another forum member in the Ninja Boxter thread.

POST 3Original post

And since you (and others?) aren't into the books, let's throw one in there that's a bit more contemporary

POST 4Original post

And, while I'm at it... if considered to be a joke, you are only showing the punchline. The meme in question was posted in reply to what (I thought) was a post filled with language designed to appear rhetoric, but reads like the author suffers with Wernicke's aphasia.

POST 6Original post

Quotes source post: 452679

[Image-only or quote-only post; no author-written text.] http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v203/horo_horo04/violin.jpg

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

^Must be the more formal Iberian version. So maybe una montera (matador's hat) would be a better fit here. agree on dropping the De La... John of the Snow? Hmm...

POST 9Original post

In my rough Spanish it's didn't really sound funny I guess I missed something.

POST 10Original post

Getting it and finding it funny are two different things. I understood the Spanish, and I got the reference, just not the point.

POST 11Original post

[Image-only or quote-only post; no author-written text.] http://images.tapatalk-cdn.com/15/06/06/ce7dc8e9953197844c332f2ea1ce378a.jpg

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.