8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCurrent rate?
Leading reported evidence
Run deal peramiters and pf was still the lowest payment
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I just ran my deal peramiters and PF was still the lowest payment.
Leading evidence: 'Run deal peramiters and pf was still the lowest payment' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run deal peramiters and pf was still the lowest payment' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Use final haggling:<a href="http://www.leasecompare.com/#" target="_blank">compare leases</a>
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Here's the website I used for the final haggling:<a href="http://www.leasecompare.com/#" target="_blank">Compare leases</a> .
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Any rates and residuals are going to vary depending on year of car, model, milage and when you get it. For instance, any rates quoted today for an ordered vehicle that arrives in the spring will not be valid. With all the manufacturers I've delt with none have held rates for more than the current period,ie.month,quater or program period. Is Porsche finance different? Please give specifics of your request. I just leased a car and would be happy to share info.
I ordered 03 996 TT( novbember allocation) and my dealer told me same things as you posted. I would like to get some idea what is current rate and I hope your input help me to negotiate when I get mine. Thanks again..
Here's the website I used for the final haggling:<a href="http://www.leasecompare.com/#" target="_blank">Compare leases</a> . It should give you an idea on what the CURRENT rates are, and you get several quotes right on line. As stated above, the final rates for when you are ready to lease will be different from now, so check again when the car is in or prior to signing on the dotted line.
I have no affiliation with anyone on the above website. In fact, I ended up with an in-house lease with the dealer due to some special needs I had,not with any of the leasing companies from the above web site.
I leased my 02 996 C2 in July with Porsche Financial. I did some brief comparisons with local
leasing companies that I know and PF was the best payment. That doesn't mean there aren't lower payments with some co. like Putnam or whoever but I do like dealing with the captive finance arm of the mfg. since they do have an interest in customer satisfaction.Hopefully! My rate was .0027
and residual was 57% for 10k miles\yr.
The current residual for a 03 TT in the ALG guide is 61% for 12k. Porsche Fin. should offer a higher residual.
here is a link to the exact formula for computing a lease payment, along with an example:
<a href="http://www.leaseguide.com/lease08.htm" target="_blank">http://www.leaseguide.com/lease08.htm</a>
And that site that was posted above had money factors on a 996 as low as .00214 (5.136%), with a 48 month residual of 49%.
Palting, Lease compare is a great site. I just ran my deal peramiters and PF was still the lowest payment. The rates offered by the banks on the site are pretty low but the residuals are lower also.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
