fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Wait 'till you see this photo w/o Caption!

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
27 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWait 'till you see this photo w/o Caption!

Reported or suspected cause

worst ad i've ever seen

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

This picture is probably the worst ad I've ever seen from an automobile company.

Wait 'till you see this photo w/o Caption!
Frequently discussed work

Use number

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

If we can find out the number assigned to the Cayenne we can begin a campaign to drop the name Cayenne and just use the number.

Wait 'till you see this photo w/o Caption!
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'worst ad i've ever seen' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'worst ad i've ever seen' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Use number' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 27 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use number

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

If we can find out the number assigned to the Cayenne we can begin a campaign to drop the name Cayenne and just use the number.

Wait 'till you see this photo w/o Caption!
Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use number

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

If we can find out the number assigned to the Cayenne we can begin a campaign to drop the name Cayenne and just use the number.

Wait 'till you see this photo w/o Caption!
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

worst ad i've ever seen

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

This picture is probably the worst ad I've ever seen from an automobile company.

Wait 'till you see this photo w/o Caption!
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Well, it had to happen sometime...the Cayenne shown with the "real" Porsches. Any opinions on this?

POST 2Original post

That picture just about sums it all up, doesn't it.

POST 3Original post

Move over Pontiac Aztec.. The new World's Ugliest Car has arrived.

POST 4Original post

You could actually get large pets sucked up into those air intakes just driving by on the road. Is that safe? That car kind of reminds me of a neighbour we had when I was a kid. She had the biggest nostrils ever, and it always made me a little sick when having to look up at her (remember, I was a kid). Oh yeah, and she looked alot like Maggie Thatcher as well.....enough said.

POST 5Original post

Oh no... That it looks even more afuw with all those fine sportscars... And no matter how many times they repeat it, that stylized Slovakian VW does NOT belong on the same grid with those great Porsches on the photo!

POST 6Original post

Just wait till turn one where it will roll over onto the 917... <img src="graemlins/oops.gif" border="0" alt="[oops]" />

POST 7Original post

There I was in the paddock of the ALMS race at VIR last weekend when a Golf GTI rolls by. In a flash, I see the design for the rear of the cayenne. OOh boy, from the front like a sneeze, from the side like a Sante Fe and from the rear like a Golf. The best we can hope for is that Porsche goes back to F1 in 2004 like Autoweek has suggested and we can forget all about this particular interlude.

POST 8Original post

No comment. <img src="graemlins/icon501.gif" border="0" alt="[icon501]" />

POST 9Original post

Oh the humanity.I think I can now finally accept the Boxster. Good lord.

POST 10Original post

[quote]Originally posted by Othello: <strong>Move over Pontiac Aztec.. The new World's Ugliest Car has arrived.</strong><hr></blockquote> have to disagree. nothing comes close to the ugly space that the Asstek occupies... hmm, Rothmanns 959 five cars back? nice...

POST 11Original post

I don't know what Porsche was guessing the response to this pic would be I think it reinforced my earlier opinion that the cayenne has no place in Porsche's line-up. What a waste of technological resources!! The improvments they could have made on the rest of the line-up and their absence from racing is a heavy price to pay for this sorry looking VW refugee <img src="graemlins/c.gif" border="0" alt="[ouch]" />

POST 14Original post

i hate all suv's but if the pepper allows porsche to remain independent it's well worth it. btw--does anyone disagree it will be the biggest selling porsche within 2 years?

POST 15Original post

I hope they 'll do the race Paris-Dakar...it could be interesting, And prove us what Porsche AG done with this cayenne..

POST 16Original post

[quote]Originally posted by David R. Hendrickson: <strong>hmm, Rothmanns 959 five cars back? nice...</strong><hr></blockquote> See, there you go! The Cayenne's qualified five rows ahead of the 959. Progress!

POST 17Original post

I think am about to be sick......... <img src="graemlins/icon501.gif" border="0" alt="[icon501]" /> .....uh......oh..........ahhhh... <img src="graemlins/crying.gif" border="0" alt="[crying]" /> .... Yep! There goes lunch ! <img src="graemlins/icon501.gif" border="0" alt="[icon501]" /> .......uh....ahhhh... <img src="graemlins/crying.gif" border="0" alt="[crying]" /> .... And there goes breakfast too! STOP THE INSANITY! <img src="graemlins/c.gif" border="0" alt="[ouch]" />

POST 18 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Great post M758. This picture is probably the worst ad I've ever seen from an automobile company. Why they put this SUV in with all of those very rare, exotic, gantastic Porsches is beyone me. If they wanted to make an impression they should have put the SUV in front of the Porsche Tractor, their aircraft engine and the German Tiger Tank that Porsche helped design/build (whatever). That would have been a more focused ad.

POST 19Original post

[quote]Originally posted by Don Watson: <strong>Great post M758. [snip] If they wanted to make an impression they should have put the SUV in front of the Porsche Tractor, their aircraft engine and the German Tiger Tank that Porsche helped design/build (whatever). That would have been a more focused ad.</strong><hr></blockquote> Don, GREAT IDEA!! <img src="graemlins/bigok.gif" border="0" alt="[thumbsup]" /> Imagine this. Picture Tiger tank with Rothman's 959 Dakar winner & Cayenne Caption = "What do you get when you mix power and speed? Introducting the Porsche Cayenne!" Heck that would be great ad! I would even think it would be cool..... Now for the photoshop work to make it a happen!

POST 20Original post

OK, so it helps keep Porsche solvent. But it also almost makes me embarrassed of owning Porsche ....kinda like that relative you don't want to admit shares the same bloodline. Ugh! Edward

POST 22Original post

My first car was a Volvo 480 Turbo (two door coup�), Porsche had made the turbo-conversion on a Renault engine placed in a small front wheel drive Volvo. I can�t help it, but that old Volvo is much more Porsche to me than the Cayenne... yuck. /A

POST 23Original post

In the not so long ago, when asked what kind of car you owned and you answered "Porsche", nothing more needed to be said. Everybody except the completely illiterate knew what it meant. Totally different had you answered BMW or MB. Truck, sedan, sportscar? Porsche seems to be heading the way of the other German marques, unfortunately. I am considering answering "Carrera " when asked the question, but it doesn't quite have the same ring as the old "Porsche" would have.

POST 24 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Palting...here's a way out. Porsche assigns a number to all Porsches they manufacture. If we can find out the number assigned to the Cayenne we can begin a campaign to drop the name Cayenne and just use the number. You know a Carrera really is a 996 kind of thing. Can anyone find out the number assigned to the Cayenne? <img src="graemlins/jumper.gif" border="0" alt="[jumper]" />

POST 25Original post

[quote]Originally posted by Don Watson: <strong>...Can anyone find out the number assigned to the Cayenne? <img src="graemlins/jumper.gif" border="0" alt="[jumper]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote> 13 or 666!? <img src="graemlins/roflmao.gif" border="0" alt="[hiha]" /> At least that's how bad I think it is. I agree with you guys, now you need to tell that your car is 911, I don't think Carrera works so well (at least if you're talking to Porsche nut). 911 works always (even with people who don't know much about Porsches). I myself say something like this: "...yep, it's 911 (factorys project number is, and Porsche nut, lik me, call it 993), it's the last aircooled Porsche, I love it, it's really not a car to me etc. and I never mention anything about this newcoming truck! Once did to a friend who knows little or nothing about Porsches and he immediately started wondering why in earth they're building an SUV? Made me feel even worse. And Edward, well put, that's how I feel.

POST 26Original post

Excuse the re-post from last week, but seeing the picture makes me want to vent again... And here Herr chairman looked like he'd be a tougher mark... Last weeks whole "we won't sign zee accounting statements" is fine - even understandable. But, his latest quotes (and staged picture of the P-fish with legendary Porsche endurance cars) in AutoWeek gets me going... With regard to LeMans (and therefore endurance racing)... [quote] "It's not really competitive anymore - it's really just VW with several different brands and some smaller brands" <hr></blockquote> Meanwhile Porsche might be thinking of dumping huge sums into F1 engines? Like F1 hasn't been just a little dominated by Ferrari over the past three years Hey don't get me wrong - racing is racing. Hell I'm not even clicking past NASCAR these days, but the hypocrisy of his statement is stifling. Porsche has sold out it's racing program to build the ugly P-fish . If VW is dominating endurance racing - then go after VW! If the P-fish is good enough to pose infront of the ledgends of Stuttgart, why is it that only VW will race theirs? Oh, right guess they'll end up dominating that venue too - so why bother. This only reenforces the position that the P-fish is looking like the ultimate poser Porsche . They are so smug that they did the right thing and that it'll sell. Now they look like they are on the "we've always been about racing" kick...um, but not elite endurance racing - that's just a bunch of VWs...please, so much for vaunted German logic. To me Porsche means endurance racing and overall wins - anything else is...well just anything else. Have a great and safe Labor Day weekend...

POST 27Original post

The responses here are hysterical. I've had a good laugh reading them. I agree with you: the Cayenne is an awful looking opinion IMHO, and its sad (but inevitable I assume) to see it put next to such historical greats. Regards.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.