12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHwhere are the cops when you need 'em?
Leading reported evidence
Use plane
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Great idea my friend, I'll try it later on with the one that I use for my plane.
Leading evidence: 'Use plane' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check speedo' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I asked him if he wouldn't mind hitting me with the radar if I turned around and went by him again so I could check my speedo.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Somebody said that it's be running much faster than actual.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've been wondering about the accuracy of my speedo ever since I reported my fuel gauge problem (which is supposed to be fixed, I'll find out soon enough). Somebody said that it's be running much faster than actual.
So here I am, yesterday, going down Windward Parkway (those in Atlanta will now it's a regular speed trap), round one of the bends and there he is - Mr. Policeman. Quick speedo check while simultaneosly hitting the brakes - I see 60mph and I'm in a 45mph zone
What does the cop do? Bugger all. So now I'm really thinking my speedo is off.
Anyway, I turn around and went to see the cop. Parked next to him, windows open, he seems pretty cool and approachable. I asked him if he wouldn't mind hitting me with the radar if I turned around and went by him again so I could check my speedo. He said normally he'd love to but this was the one day his radar had broken on him and he couldn't use it <img src="graemlins/roflmao.gif" border="0" alt="[hiha]" />
So I'm still none the wiser and it might explain why he didn't budge went I rounded the corner at 60mph..or was it 50mph...?
An easy way to check you speedo is to get out on an Interstate that has mile markers, hopefully on a fairly flat stretch where it is easy to maintain a constant pace. Run at a steady 60 mph for 1 mile and time yourself with a stopwatch. If the speedo is deadon, it should take exactly 1 minute to travel a mile at 60 mph.
To calculate your actual speed, divide 3600 by the actual number of seconds that it took you to go one mile. This will give you your speed in mph and should give you an idea of how accurate your speedo is.
Karl
[quote]Originally posted by Sloth:
<strong>I find the speedo runs a bit on the high side. The lack of accuracy is a known issue... just wait to see what it does to your odometer.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
Any idea how fast?
Find a friend with a handheld GPS. It will tell you exactly how fast you're going and if the speedo is off.
I've checked mine and the digital is spot on.
[quote]Originally posted by aen:
<strong>Find a friend with a handheld GPS. It will tell you exactly how fast you're going and if the speedo is off.
I've checked mine and the digital is spot on.</strong><hr></blockquote>
aen - you're assuming I don't have one
Great idea my friend, I'll try it later on with the one that I use for my plane.
Look in you owners manual......
You should have a chart...RPM to MPH in a particular gear....If not I'm sure we can all help you by posting our speeds in (say 3rd gear) for 3K 4K and 5K that should make you feel that your ok.
Do you have stock size tires?????
