10 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHQuestions for 981 manual transmission owners. - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Replace anything about the ratios, what would you
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
If you were to change anything about the ratios, what would you change?
Questions for 981 manual transmission owners. - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Replace anything about the ratios, what would you' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace anything about the ratios, what would you' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Pound for pound it's a superb bit of kit and probably, using the pound for pound factor, the best car I have.
Questions for 981 manual transmission owners. - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
1. Are you happy with the gear ratios?
2. Do you routinely skip gears going up and down the box?
3. If you were to change anything about the ratios, what would you change?
OzOs
Ozzie Osmond said:
1. Are you happy with the gear ratios?
2. Do you routinely skip gears going up and down the box?
3. If you were to change anything about the ratios, what would you change?
OzOs
1. Ambivalent. 90% satisfactory all of the time: 10% too long gearing some of the time
2. Regularly & routinely. It's the only way to fly!
3. Lower 2nd & 3rd. Leave 1st, 4th, 5th & 6th as is: 4, 5 & 6 no use for continued acceleration in this country without possible loss of licence: would probably get too much wheel spin if 1st any lower.
Edited by Robograd on Saturday 12th December 16:12
Which version?
I currently have a 2.7 manual on loan and I think it's fine. If you are trying to look for that extra tenth in F1 qualifying the change in gearing might make the difference but most will not notice that much. Also, in the 2.7, you are wringing it a bit more so the shifting feels more intuitive to me. With the GTS I find you can get caught in two minds about which gear to select. The extra torque and power can also make you lazier with shifting.
My main complaint really is the clutch is a lot heavier on the GTS than the 2.7. Which probably also explains why it feels more intuitive in the standard car. This is enough to make the two feel very different to drive (if you ignore the different engines). I didn't like the 2.7 when I jumped into it at first but it's growing on me.
Addendum to earlier post.
My initial comments referred to the Cayman GTS variant I presently own - lovely car, by the way.
Digressing a little, according to the Motortrend USA Youtube site, they calculated that if you were to give the halo GT4 model (hallowed be thy name & twenty 'Hail Mary's")" normal gear ratios" - allowing 35mph in 1st max. & 65 max. in 2nd, rather than what is on offer now, i.e.45mph 1st & 82 in 2nd: 0 - 60mph would fall to 3.5 serious seconds from the mid 4.0secs it apparently offers now!!
Therefore the GTS has got to be worth 4.4 secs, pro rata, with those "normal gear ratios", me thinks?
Naughty Porsche! I'm beginning to see a pattern here: satisfy the initial feeding frenzy with the Mark 1 GT4: then for not a lot of R & D & minimal expense market GT4 Mark 2 with shorter gear ratios & up the de-tuned Carrera S bhp. Hence, starting a second feeding frenzy - & so it continues with Mark 3: cunning these Germans, what? Simples!!
Robograd said:
Lower 2nd & 3rd. Leave 1st, 4th, 5th & 6th as is: 4, 5 & 6 no use for continued acceleration in this country without possible loss of licence: would probably get too much wheel spin if 1st any lower.
Interesting comment.
Robograd said:
Naughty Porsche! I'm beginning to see a pattern here: satisfy the initial feeding frenzy with the Mark 1 GT4: then for not a lot of R & D & minimal expense market GT4 Mark 2 with shorter gear ratios & up the de-tuned Carrera S bhp. Hence, starting a second feeding frenzy - & so it continues with Mark 3: cunning these Germans, what? Simples!!
I think you may be on to something there.
"Interesting comment" & "you may have something there".
Are not comments usually associated with my utterances. I must start taking more water with the wine.
Ozzie Osmond said:
Yup, that's exactly where I landed.
For me it's the whole point of being into cars. I derive pleasure from learning how to get the best from each of my cars, it's a large part of why I have such an eclectic collection.
Ive never once thought there was anything wrong* with my Boxster 981S. Pound for pound it's a superb bit of kit and probably, using the pound for pound factor, the best car I have. Not the fastest, not the most fun, not the best looking, not the comfiest or best equipped, not the most practical but overall, considering the price as well, the best.
Apart from the sodding heater etc controls. Stupid position. I leave any changes required via them until I'm in 2nd, 4th or 6th. There I go adapting my driving again. ;-)
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.