15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 for £10k? Am i dreaming...
Reported or suspected cause
acquired taste
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Black and Boxster Red is probably acceptable, Black and Flamenco is probably an acquired taste.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not necessarily; if it's been looked after properly, there's no reason it won't be a good buy, it's just that your annual service may well set you back a couple of grand because things will start perishing, you'll be replacing items that will maybe only crop up at a certain age etc.
Leading evidence: 'acquired taste' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'acquired taste' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace items' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Then add painting and fitting, so probably the best part of another £1,000 if you pay someone.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not necessarily; if it's been looked after properly, there's no reason it won't be a good buy, it's just that your annual service may well set you back a couple of grand because things will start perishing, you'll be replacing items that will maybe only crop up at a certain age etc.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
That said, 996s seem to run better if used regularly, so you may get away with just having the usual consumable costs (tyres, servicing, maybe brakes etc.).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Couldn't agree more with the above, but you will LOVE it when it's running right :thumb:
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace items
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not necessarily; if it's been looked after properly, there's no reason it won't be a good buy, it's just that your annual service may well set you back a couple of grand because things will start perishing, you'll be replacing items that will maybe only crop up at a certain age etc.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
That said, 996s seem to run better if used regularly, so you may get away with just having the usual consumable costs (tyres, servicing, maybe brakes etc.).
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
A well speccd one will set me back apprx 12k and is less likely to give me problems as it'll probably have less than 80k on the clock and will be 2003+...
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
That said, 996s seem to run better if used regularly, so you may get away with just having the usual consumable costs (tyres, servicing, maybe brakes etc.).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T150451Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi guys...
Newbie here, so forgive me if i'm not 100% clued on at the moment.
I'm currently in the market for a new car.
I've been looking at e46 m3's and recently i've been thinking about a 996.
I've seen the odd one with high mileage, a little tatty and needing a bit of tlc for 10-12k..
Could you guys share some tips, advice and experiances please.
Do you think i could get a 'decent' 996 for 10k?
Im a huge fan of the aero/gt3 look.. So i'd even consider something that needs a bit of work..
Are gt3 kits/spoilers available on the market, are they straight swaps etc what would i be looking at cost wise?
Any help would be much appreciated!
Tia :thumbs:
What he said!
£10k will get you a tatty / leggy 996; that's not to say it won't be a good buy, it could well be, but you will probably need to spend more maintaining it as various parts need replacing. That said, 996s seem to run better if used regularly, so you may get away with just having the usual consumable costs (tyres, servicing, maybe brakes etc.). Depends if you're happy running one that already has 130k+ on the clock?
GT3 / Carrera aero kits are costly to retro-fit; easy enough to do but be prepared to spend some serious money (up to £5k including painting / fitting).
I know you probably want a 911 but you could get a really nice Boxster for £10k, that might be a more sensible buy...? :?:
Hi,
My advice would be not to purchase a 10K car if you are expecting years of trouble free motoring from the start. You should pay the average price at least, a cheap car is just that, be very careful. If you can, save a little more and buy a bit later. Owning a Porsche should be a pleasure, buying a sub standard one will only tarnish that dream.
Regards
Vinny
+1 :agree:
Remember that these cars started off costing in excess of £50,000 so just because it's £10,000 now doesn't mean the maintenace costs have depreciated along with the value of the car
Thanks for the replies guys!
I hear what you guys are saying..
What are these cars like in general, i understand there are no gurantees with cars, but in general how these hold upafter 110k+ miles?
Im confident i can maintain the car in general, but will a 1998/1999 be problematic?
Its probably more sensible for me to get an e46 m3. A well speccd one will set me back apprx 12k and is less likely to give me problems as it'll probably have less than 80k on the clock and will be 2003+...
I've always wanted a 993 turbo, but when i stumbled upon a 996 on ebay for 12k, it got me thinking lol!
Not necessarily; if it's been looked after properly, there's no reason it won't be a good buy, it's just that your annual service may well set you back a couple of grand because things will start perishing, you'll be replacing items that will maybe only crop up at a certain age etc.
Agreed, and an E46 M3 is a damn good car (a few mates have had them / still got them), you won't be disappointed with one. Might be best putting the 911 on hold for a year or two - 996 prices are still falling and good ones will probably be £10k in a year or two. Depressing thought for all of us who paid a lot more than that for our cars, not long ago! :nooo:
Happy hunting whatever you choose; it's a great buzz getting a new car... :thumb:
Not wanting to put you off, and you might find a gem with one mature owner and no expense spared in its upkeep.
Sadly, more likely at that price, someone is moving on a headache which you could drop £4k on and still have gremlins.
In some ways it depends what you can do to maintain the car yourself or repair faults, and how well you can spot them at point of sale.
At the end of the day it is always Condition, Condition, Condition.
And that doesn't mean how shiny it is either. A PPI is a must unless you happen to be a Porsche Technician.
As for Aerokit, you are far better to find a model with it on already. It just isn't economic to retrofit, in either parts or labour.
If you really want an OEM kit, you may want to sit down.
Just checked Design911 and PorscheShop and they charge between £2,460 and £3,180 for the front PU and splitter, sill extensions and rear spoiler.
You may wish to add the rear GT side fins at between £411 - £470.
Then add painting and fitting, so probably the best part of another £1,000 if you pay someone.
You can get replica parts for perhaps 1/3 to 1/2 price for parts (or even scrappies?).
Are you red/green colour blind Mr bigee12345?
Black and Boxster Red is probably acceptable, Black and Flamenco is probably an acquired taste.
But that is NEPHRITE!
For example, muggins here paid 15K and have spent about £1600 in the last 5 months - most of the work done myself. And it's not a tatty example..they just east cash when they need work doing...and it will. The whole Porsche reliablity myth is precisely that.
Couldn't agree more with the above, but you will LOVE it when it's running right :thumb: