19 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGT3 brake pads - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Replace whilst still in force
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My OPC has also intimated that my GT3 doesnt need another 111 check as long as its renewed whilst still in force.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also once you have the 111 point done and warranty renewed, you don't need a 111 point check done for future renewals, they don't need to see the car providing you renew before it expires.
Leading evidence: 'Replace whilst still in force' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check done' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also once you have the 111 point done and warranty renewed, you don't need a 111 point check done for future renewals, they don't need to see the car providing you renew before it expires.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Can you get the 111 check done sooner rather than later ?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My warranty is up for renewal in August and my dealer has insisted on another 111 point check even though the warranty hasnt expired.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They didn't say it was Covid related, mine is due mid August so will check with them, also referenced here:
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check done
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also once you have the 111 point done and warranty renewed, you don't need a 111 point check done for future renewals, they don't need to see the car providing you renew before it expires.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
So, that said I could fit whatever I wanted, but then again would I want any hassle if anything did need doing and they started pointing out all the changes I'd made?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
My 991.1 GT3's discs are close to being utterly shot, so planning on changing them and the pads at the same time even though the pads have reasonable life left in them. I wanted to get the Manthey Racing Pagid pads, but the dealer's response was pretty much "computer says no" and since the car is under OPC warranty the offered option is to get the official pads.
Can I / should I override them and just accept that the car's warranty won't cover the choice of pads? Or would it also invalidate the warranty for the discs, calipers etc etc? Are the official ones perfectly good anyway so melting my wallet for a different option is nigh on pointless?
They didn't seem to have any opposition to fitting the MR braided hoses, so not sure what their stance on consumables actually is!
Consumables (discs, pads etc) aren't warrantied but they could prevent you extending the warranty again. The old OPC 111-point check used to prevent total warranty extension if any non-standard parts were fitted but this appears to have gone by the wayside ni recent years. I'm not sure what the latest stance is as I don't run a car under the extended warranty.
If you're planning on extending the warranty or selling the car in the near future I'd stick with OEM. Once you start down the non-standard route it can get costly to revert it back to standard.
I do indeed intend to renew the warranty, so for peace of mind I'll stick with the suggested options for the time being. As for selling it, someone will have to prise the keys from my cold dead fingers
Can you get the 111 check done sooner rather than later ? Then you will be free to change to whatever you want and have the 2+ years of warranty ?
just as an aside - Gyro discs and Raybestos pads worked a treat as an alternative on my Cayman. Food for thought
I'd suggest Endless pads. Been using them for many years on ceramic and non ceramic rotors and they are fantastic.
Also once you have the 111 point done and warranty renewed, you don't need a 111 point check done for future renewals, they don't need to see the car providing you renew before it expires.
Far Cough said:
Can you get the 111 check done sooner rather than later ? Then you will be free to change to whatever you want and have the 2+ years of warranty ?
And then in 2 years time?
If you're going to run the extended warranty for the foreseeable future I'd stick with OEM, otherwise why bother reducing your cover?
whj said:
My warranty is up for renewal in August and my dealer has insisted on another 111 point check even though the warranty hasnt expired.
Strange, PRG said they don't need to see the car, just need to sign the paperwork on site?
They didn't say it was Covid related, mine is due mid August so will check with them, also referenced here:
http://www.911uk.com/viewtopic.php?p=1572290
Twinfan said:
And then in 2 years time?
If you're going to run the extended warranty for the foreseeable future I'd stick with OEM, otherwise why bother reducing your cover?
yes , agreed that in 2 years he will have to reconsider his position. 2 years is a long time in (my) car ownership
My OPC has also intimated that my GT3 doesnt need another 111 check as long as its renewed whilst still in force. Maybe there is a difference between known customers with a relationship compared to random folk dropping in
Twinfan said:
Interesting. I wonder if I can extend mine on my GT4 next year to get some sort of cover even if it's been modified...
Shouldn't be a problem T my GT3 warranty was renewed at 3 years old March 2021 without seeing the car in fact the last time they saw it was at 2 years old for its first service.
av185 said:
Shouldn't be a problem T my GT3 warranty was renewed at 3 years old March 2021 without seeing the car in fact the last time they saw it was at 2 years old for its first service.
Interesting - cheers. I'll need to weigh up whether the parts that would definitely be covered is worth the warranty cost versus the parts that might not be covered. Probably worth an off-the-record chat with my OPC's workshop manager before paying anything
I believe my local OPC's position was that the 111 will not be required because the car is still under warranty from its previous owner, as long as I renew before expiry. So, that said I could fit whatever I wanted, but then again would I want any hassle if anything did need doing and they started pointing out all the changes I'd made?
As already stated , the bits you are looking to change are consumables and not covered particularly anyway. It's the route I'd go down. If your PCM failed , they would have a hard time justifying it's because you got different pads in !!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.