911uk

Urgent nut query!

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHUrgent nut query!

Leading reported evidence

Replace lost locking sockets this way

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I know people who have replaced lost locking sockets this way.
Original post Read captured discussion
Urgent nut query!

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace lost locking sockets this way' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace lost locking sockets this way' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Set from an opc

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
They are £58.12 inc VAT for a set from an OPC.
Original post Read captured discussion
Urgent nut query!

Set unless i can avoid it as

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I don't want to buy another set unless I can avoid it as that'll probably be about £200!!
Original post Read captured discussion
Urgent nut query!

Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace lost locking sockets this way

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I know people who have replaced lost locking sockets this way.
Original post Read captured discussion
Urgent nut query!

Set from an opc

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
They are £58.12 inc VAT for a set from an OPC.
Original post Read captured discussion
Urgent nut query!

Set unless i can avoid it as

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I don't want to buy another set unless I can avoid it as that'll probably be about £200!!
Original post Read captured discussion
Urgent nut query!

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi, Hoping someone might be able to help. I need my car tomorrow and just discovered a rear nut is missing. It's the lockable one, so no doubt not screwed in properly when i had my tyres replaced!!! It's a number 4 lock and wondered whether these are items the OPC sells separately and typically carry stock of. I don't want to buy another set unless I can avoid it as that'll probably be about £200!! The car will be securely locked so I could get away with a regular bolt if these are sold separately, as I might be able to source one from a breakers later on. Cheers

POST 2Original post

The keys are sold separately (in case of loss), but AFAIK the bolts themselves are sold as a four-pack. I guess they might be able to do a special order? If they cost that much, I would investigate some £30 McGards from Halfrauds or similar. As for spare bolts, during alloy upgrades or dealer fit of locking wheel bolts etc, the service dept often chuck the "spares" (ie 4 bolts per car). Call your local OPC, they probably have a box full (for free)?

POST 3Original post

They are £58.12 inc VAT for a set from an OPC. A non-locking bolt is £6.28. Like GT4 says, drop in to your local OPC and see what they can do. They are quite likely to have a box of bolts in the workshop and could probably match one up for you. I know people who have replaced lost locking sockets this way.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.