fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

Who said the 996 wasn't a proper 911? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWho said the 996 wasn't a proper 911? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Replace direction between two opposite direction bends (a zig-zag)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I can understand that the heavy rear weight can be useful in changing direction between two opposite direction bends (a zig-zag) which are not too close together, but a slalom seems a lot trickier to master.

Who said the 996 wasn't a proper 911? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace direction between two opposite direction bends (a zig-zag)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace direction between two opposite direction bends (a zig-zag)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Run then pick up speed

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Start slow on first run then pick up speed on subsequent runs.

Who said the 996 wasn't a proper 911? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace direction between two opposite direction bends (a zig-zag)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I can understand that the heavy rear weight can be useful in changing direction between two opposite direction bends (a zig-zag) which are not too close together, but a slalom seems a lot trickier to master.

Who said the 996 wasn't a proper 911? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Run then pick up speed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Start slow on first run then pick up speed on subsequent runs.

Who said the 996 wasn't a proper 911? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Never driven a 911 yet, although I have read a little golden rule with them on a few occasions. That being to brake on the straights only, turn into the apex at a sensible speed, then get on the power earlier than you might in a normal car. Most people seem to agree that braking and cornering in a 911 don't mix all that well. Ninemeister is your man to ask tho.

POST 2Original post

To ne honest not really done a slalom in a 911 or 996.. Had both cars just not slalomed.If it is C4 just boot it and turn....My experience is more with 2wd 911.I think I would be very careful not to try to do anything aggressive with the steering wheel at the point the weight balance moves the weight to the back of the car. Hard to explain but smoothness would be the key and not trying to boot it and throw the steering around too much. I quite fancy giving it a go though. Tyre pressures would be critical for a smooth time with this event.Have fun practising> >> Edited by clubsport on Sunday 1st June 15:53

POST 3Original post

hi, you asked for some tips and gave a good descrption of your current technique on a cone based 'slalom' course. Here is my take on it. The only inputs are steering and accelerator, no use of brake pedal at all until you hit the end of the run and then only when travelling in a straight line. As you draw level with a cone,say its to your right, hopefully not too far right (wide) of it, with a 'steady' accelerator pressure being held, turn in to the right to go round cone and immediately- as soon as poss after you move that steering wheel- push on the accelerator...this gets some squat on the back and plenty of push into the turn ,having turned you will now be taking off the wheel at same time backing off pedal ( not too much) back to steady to avoid speeding up, preparing to turn in left as you approach the next cone on your left, again dig into that accelerator just after you move the wheel... What you want is a rhythm and speed that matches the spacing of the cones. Start slow on first run then pick up speed on subsequent runs. If you push on the pedal before you turn the wheel then front will be light and you get understeer, if you lift off the pedal in a turn then back will be light and you get oversteer ...to be avoided.HTH

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks, folks. As I suspected, smoothness and rhythm is the key - finding the rhythm is the hard bit. Since I have managed to shred my tyres, I will be trying out Michelin Pilot Sport Cups next. Will keep you informed as to how good they are.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Having experienced a couple of beautifully executed pirouettes at Friday's Autocross event (sprints to you), I can confirm that the engine is indeed still at the rear of the car. Hugely frustrating day. 4 runs, of which the first two were at noddy pace to scout the circuit, and the final 2 were in retrospect somewhat over-exuberant, and resulted in tyre-smoking tankslappers followed by a graceful pas de deux between Porker and cones. As a result, I would have been better off had I turned up in a 1973 Datsun. Would appreciate some tips (although I am looking for some driver training in the next few months), particularly dealing with slaloms at highish revs in second, so I guess around 40-50mph or so. I had previously perfected the point and squirt method in a Lancia Integrale - that is lift off as you turn in to the first cone, let the weight transfer, then get back on the gas and turn hard the opposite way, lift off again, weight transfers etc. Easy peasy. Not so with a 911 for the obvious reason. I can understand that the heavy rear weight can be useful in changing direction between two opposite direction bends (a zig-zag) which are not too close together, but a slalom seems a lot trickier to master. What method would you chaps suggest?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.