17 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGoing to be some very disappointed customers in the US! - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Run cars, gt cars, pts cars, etc
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What would Porsche do about limited run cars, GT cars, PTS cars, etc.
Going to be some very disappointed customers in the US! - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Run cars, gt cars, pts cars, etc' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run cars, gt cars, pts cars, etc' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Going to be some very disappointed customers in the US! - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/17/world/europe/fe...
I was about to post the same thing ....
What would Porsche do about limited run cars, GT cars, PTS cars, etc. ??
Filibuster said:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/17/world/europe/fe...
I was about to post the same thing ....
What would Porsche do about limited run cars, GT cars, PTS cars, etc. ??
There was a similar problem with 991.2 cars I think bound for South America….think they re-built them.
US has been getting a lot more cars than the UK for the last year….dealer forecourts over there seem to have a decent amount of cars as they always do. US got record number of cars last year…we got less than we did pre-Covid and Porsche made a record number of cars. The UK’s supply problems are Porsche’s decision not a lack of chips, they are prioritising other markets like the US.
Curledge said:
Would imagine this is going to have a knock on effect to UK supply now as the rebuilds get prioritorised
It's an interesting decision they need to make. As it stands, they've got 1,100 pissed off customers, if they bounce other cars to rebuild these, I think it's reasonable to assume that they'll end up with 2,200 pissed off customers.
Whatever the decision is, I wouldn't like to be the one having to make it!
Certainly a write off. The interesting question is whether they have to add additional fire suppression on the other ships as this appears to have some EVs on fire which require special equipment to extinguish. This would cause big delays.
Dealers have been told that affected customers will get priority.
There almost no inventory of 911s in North America and new customers were already being told 1-2 years.
https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/photos-...
The fire appears to have fully engulfed the cargo decks so yes everything on board will be a write off. There will be some marine insurers and re-insurers that are not having a good week because of this. Hopefully the salvors will be able to tow it back to port in Europe without it sinking en-route.
gsewell said:
With nobody on board to control the fire, it could be a total write off. That would be £200M insurance claim.
Cargo 9293911 felicity ace is a complete write off being handled by Britannia P&I.
gsewell said:
With nobody on board to control the fire, it could be a total write off. That would be £200M insurance claim.
- "It’s almost assured that the Felicity Ace will be declared a total loss"
https://gcaptain.com/around-400-million-worth-of-c...
And "Lithium-ion batteries in the electric vehicles on board are “keeping the fire alive,"
https://gcaptain.com/lithium-ion-batteries-electri...
