9 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH997 GT3 Bedford noise level chat - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Install vacuum bung, went back
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
So I returned to pit and installed the vacuum bung, went back on track and had no problems for the rest of the day.
Leading evidence: 'Install vacuum bung, went back' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install vacuum bung, went back' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
After a few sessions, I started to redline on the straights and then I got black flagged for noise, set off the drive by mic.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Prior to that they have helped out by testing slightly off centre.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
There have been a few threads on GT3 noise levels on track, just wanted to share my experience at Bedford with and without the Laguna Seca mod. Car is a 2007 MY 997.1 GT3, track config was Bedford Sen.
Was a cold day, about 2 degrees at sign on. Static noise test was done without Laguna seca mod and registered 100.6db (limit was 101). I tested with clutch down and aircon off. I think this was low possibly due to low ambient temps.
On track I initially went out with sport off, no Laguna seca mod. I was up shifting slightly early on the main straight, had no problems initially. After a few sessions, I started to redline on the straights and then I got black flagged for noise, set off the drive by mic.
So I returned to pit and installed the vacuum bung, went back on track and had no problems for the rest of the day. Car did feel down on power though, it was noticeable. One of the guys in the States has dyno'd with and without Laguna Seca mod and the car does lose a hefty chunk of mid range torque (17.2 lb/ft), enough to notice.
So either change up early with sport off or use the vacuum bung and Bedford and hopefully you should be fine.
Details of the mod here for those that haven't heard of it (dyno at bottom of page):
http://sharkwerks.com/porsche/technical-articles/1...
HTH
My 997.1 GT3 with a standard exhaust won't pass a static noise test at Bedford. I tried with sport off, warm engine, weather a bit damp with outside temp of about 8 degs. Tried later in the day when it had warmed and dried, still no joy. It requires a sympathetic tester to get it on track. Once there it's fine and drive by limits are no problem.
In my experience the drive-by is never a problem, just the static test. So no reason to disable sport mode once on the track.
Passing (or getting a waiver) for the static test is always a nuisance though.
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I was able to notice it, it's not massive but it is there, especially when passing other cars coming out of slower corners where the revs build from lower down the rev range, the GT3 definitely struggled more than I remember passing M3s and the like.
Mario149 said:
My 997.1 GT3 with a standard exhaust won't pass a static noise test at Bedford. I tried with sport off, warm engine, weather a bit damp with outside temp of about 8 degs. Tried later in the day when it had warmed and dried, still no joy. It requires a sympathetic tester to get it on track. Once there it's fine and drive by limits are no problem.
What did your car register on the static test?
S1MMA said:
Mario149 said:
My 997.1 GT3 with a standard exhaust won't pass a static noise test at Bedford. I tried with sport off, warm engine, weather a bit damp with outside temp of about 8 degs. Tried later in the day when it had warmed and dried, still no joy. It requires a sympathetic tester to get it on track. Once there it's fine and drive by limits are no problem.
What did your car register on the static test?
About 1dB over, say 102 or so
I've been to Bedford with my 997.1 GT3 a few times, mostly its a battle to get through the static test. Having said that I was there on Saturday and passed with no issues. Prior to that they have helped out by testing slightly off centre. I do carry my Decibel Devils just in case but have never needed them.
On drive by I tend to get a warning every visit. My usual tactic when passing a meter is to upshift early and be on the opposite side of the track to the meter. However, I still get caught out if I am close to another car.
So basically a PITA...
Hopefully Oulton on Friday will be a bit easier.
S1MMA said:
There have been a few threads on GT3 noise levels on track, just wanted to share my experience at Bedford with and without the Laguna Seca mod. Car is a 2007 MY 997.1 GT3, track config was Bedford Sen.
Was a cold day, about 2 degrees at sign on. Static noise test was done without Laguna seca mod and registered 100.6db (limit was 101). I tested with clutch down and aircon off. I think this was low possibly due to low ambient temps.
On track I initially went out with sport off, no Laguna seca mod. I was up shifting slightly early on the main straight, had no problems initially. After a few sessions, I started to redline on the straights and then I got black flagged for noise, set off the drive by mic.
So I returned to pit and installed the vacuum bung, went back on track and had no problems for the rest of the day. Car did feel down on power though, it was noticeable. One of the guys in the States has dyno'd with and without Laguna Seca mod and the car does lose a hefty chunk of mid range torque (17.2 lb/ft), enough to notice.
So either change up early with sport off or use the vacuum bung and Bedford and hopefully you should be fine.
Details of the mod here for those that haven't heard of it (dyno at bottom of page):
http://sharkwerks.com/porsche/technical-articles/1...
HTH
Be careful with the vacum pipe trick. I used this to get passed noise issues at Donny once. By the end of the day the left bank header had split the weld behind the cat. Doing this retains a lot more heat in the system.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.