22 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH911 in TopGun - Page 2 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Test of time
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
911 in TopGun - Page 2 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Test of time' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test of time' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
911 in TopGun - Page 2 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Back to the cinema for the first time in 2 years to Top Gun Maverick. 🍿Not only is it an amazing film full of action, great music and ‘80s memorabilia with glimpses of the original 1986 film. It finishes with the epitome of cool a classic 911s.
Great bit of escapism after all the craziness we have all had to put up with over the past 2 years.
Saw it last night. Great escapism, and very good fun. Wife now wants to rewatch the original tonight.
It's basically the same as The Force Awakens and Star Wars. They've remade something very close to the original story, which very effectively pushes the audiences' buttons via cues and homages to the original.
Currently getting 8.7 on IMDB, which puts it in rare company (1986 original gets 6.9).
And yes, Jennifer Connolley definitely did it for me.
I was going to give a Maverick a miss, until it’s on Netflicks. However, if fellow PistonHeaders are impressed, I will probably go out and check it out.
Watched it this evening with my bro (who's a Wing Commander engineer). We both gave it the seal of approval.
Great film, minimal CGI, cracking flight sequences. Recommended. (and the 911 is lovely too)
I wasn't going to bother watching 'Top Goose' in the cinema, but mates (whose judgment I trust) reckon it's worth a watch, so I'll try to get to see it on the big screen.
Mrs PB and I went yesterday.
I have to concede I excitedly whispered 'silver Porsche' to her whenever it came on screen.
(I have an Arctic Silver 986S!)
I know that as a man who turns 44 this time next week, I should have seen the original. But I'm afraid I haven't. Enjoyed it nonetheless though, great film.
PistonBroker said:
(I have an Arctic Silver 986S!)
I know that as a man who turns 44 this time next week, I should have seen the original. But I'm afraid I haven't.
You haven't missed anything. it hasn't stood the test of time. There is a good reason it gets a 6 on IMDB, its pants.
Be glad that 44 next week is probably too young to get the cultural effect the film had on those who are the wrong side of 50. Go watch both and make up your own mind.
I saw the movie last night. I am not a fan of Tom C, but I greatly enjoyed it, especially the blast from the past scenes and product placement: the Kawa, the 911… and the planes.
Actually I saw the planes IRL at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, but the hardware looks so much better in the movie
