15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI reckon my 996T must be worth £60k+
Leading reported evidence
Use decent camera during daylight
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What I don't understand is this unique and ultimate £60k 996 wasn't worth a photograph using a decent camera during daylight.
Leading evidence: 'Use decent camera during daylight' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use decent camera during daylight' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Utterly repulsive, and that's just the sickeningly overblown (and badly spelt) description. Totally deluded.
What I don't understand is this unique and ultimate £60k 996 wasn't worth a photograph using a decent camera during daylight.
and the seller really wants to make you believe its wonderful to justify the £15-20K premium for low miles and THAT interior!
ironically i think he might have a easier job to sell if it wasnt a Porsche Exclusive Program car
cheers
Utterly ridiculous; how can you say it has 'only ever been driven gently in automatic mode', it's 10 years old for god's sake, has someone seriously owned a 911 turbo for 10 years and never ragged it once? He / She has more restraint than me... :grin:
That interior just looks like any other 996 with walnut thrown at everything possible, it's nothing particularly special (and it's hideous), and I would suggest the author of the ad gets down to the aforementioned Stratstone and has a look inside any of the cars in their showroom if he honestly believes it to be 'the best interior of any Porsche in the world'. Probably should get his ears tested too if he thinks any 996 could have a sound system that's 'the best I've ever heard in any car'. :roll:
Laughable really... :floor:
... by a footballer :?:
Even if they were mechanical saints to the car during their ownership, I bet the service driver ragged it on collection/delivery.
Wood looks bad - and could prob be replaced? - the colour is just about tolerable
Ad sounds like its been written by a prat, and price is not even serious
Am really not a fan of very dark / plain black 996 interiors - very dreary and makes a bland design even less appealing
Deluded seems to sum it up quite nicely.
The description made me cringe when I read it. OK, I'd make an allowance for mileage on the price, but I think he values that walnut at about £25-30k!
I'm all for light interiors - my black one is like a coal hole - but the walnut just destroys the look of what would otherwise be a very nice interior.
Still, spend another couple of thousand on some black plastic, and a new set of tyres (his are at least 3 years out of date) and you could have a very nice 996T - albeit the most expensive in the country.
Or save some cash and get a 3 year old 997T.............
I'm sure it costs £60k because of how it "wreaks of "NEW Car/Leather smell", that it has had the timing belt modification carried out and the belts have been replaced.
If that did it for me I'd be the happiest guy alive.....
I like the px options listed :
Something to tell us Daniel :?:
My car came from the same dealer so maybe I should add £20k...
