21 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHOver Rev Report
Leading reported evidence
Use car
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
It looks to me like you probably used your car for track or autocross — and that’s OK, but the
Leading evidence: 'Use car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run finest synthetic oil' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Just be sure to run the finest synthetic oil that you can afford and remember that oil filters are cheap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Old thread - any chance you can tell me how to run an overrev report with the Durametric?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The higher you run the revs, the more wear on the motor.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I purchased a
2008 Boxster
S last summer. Currently at 85000 miles. Recently I purchased a Durametric scanner and the over rev report is as follows:
range 1 - 1022/2394.8H (7300-7500 RPM)
range 2 - 72/2316.1H (7500-7700)
range 3 - 2/577.5H (7700-7900)
range 4 - 1/218.6H (7900-8400)
range 5 - 1/218.6H (8400-9500)
range 6 - 0/0H (9500-11000)
operating hours counter 2585.8
I am curious on how this stacks up on the abuse VS mechanical empathy scale. What are other folks seeing on their over rev reports? Does anyone have insight into the numbers on this report? Runs great, but should I be worried?
Thanks...Steve
That looks like very minimal “abuse” to me, especially given the number of hours on the motor. I’d venture to guess that the very limited number of reports the higher ranges were false alarms.
Sent from my
iPhone
using Tapatalk
I was nervous as hell when I found out that my '14 CPO Guards Red
Cayman
981
6 Speed with 30,600 miles, was owned by a police officer, and then people told me that they tend to drive hard and fast and don't worry much about tickets. Until I bought my Durametric, that is. The over rev report showed absolutely no over revs in any of the ranges with 780 hours on the engine. I'm definitely relieved.
Engine Module Siemens EMS SDI 9 Information
Porsche
part number 991.618.602.03
Coding date 22/04/13
Production number 00000000
Over-revs Range 1 0 / 0.00h
Over-revs Range 2 0 / 0.00h
Over-revs Range 3 0 / 0.00h
Over-revs Range 4 0 / 0.00h
Over-revs Range 5 0 / 0.00h
Over-revs Range 6 0 / 0.00h
Operating Hours 789.14
No worries. Looks like once the engine revs hit 8400 to 8500 range, as a guess. Over 9500 would be a concern. Just be sure to run the finest synthetic oil that you can afford and remember that oil filters are cheap.
My feeling is that one or two ignitions in ranges 3 through 6 is just noise. Since there are 3 ignitions per revolution one ignition is not really a measurable quantity. From your ignitions in range 1 and 2 I'd say this engine has hit the rev limiter a few times. No concerns at all.
Can someone let me know if this is bad or good as
I've had the car since 2009.
I have a 2007 Porsche Cayman Base 2.7L
Range 1 - 8330/4272h (7300-7500 RPM)
Range 2 - 422/3874h (7500-7700)
Range 3 - 9/3593h (7700-7900)
Range 4 - 1/1212h (7900-8400)
Range 5 - 1/1212h (8400-9500)
Range 6 - 0/0H (9500
-11000)
operating hours counter 4419
I think 4 and 5 are false readings, I do not think you can have 1 over rev in 4 and 5, what goes up must come down so having 1 twice is not logical, I have seen false readings like that before.
Yup, those have to be false. There are multiple threads on the subject. My car has a handful in Range 1, then 1 each in ranges 2-6. Annoying, but a common issue.
He’s saying that all the activity in Range 1 and 2 (which there is a decent amount of, and some of it recently) could have been avoided by shifting earlier.
The rev limiter in the ECU automatically cuts the throttle at redline to save the motor, but revving high in sport mode can still exceed the limit and trip Range 1, and possibly Range 2.
It looks to me like you probably used your car for track or autocross — and that’s OK, but the
next
prospective buyer may not be into it if they’re hunting for a babied garage queen. If you didn’t, maybe you just floored it a bunch in sport mode to make some noise?
The higher you run the revs, the more wear on the motor. In particular,
987.1
cars have been known to have weak rod bolts, which can cause a rod bearing to spin. I personally lost my first
987.1
engine that way.
Many people say to shift at 7000 rpm (or maybe even 6800) to avoid getting Range 1 and 2 overrevs...and hopefully lengthen the life of the motor.
PS. For reference, my cylinder six rod bearing spun at 60K miles with barely any Range 1 or 2 activity — though I had used the car for autocross events.
I went past the redline on RPM's for a very brief amount of time, a Certified Pre Owned
Porsche
can have a rev range 3, that is what your car has, I would not worry about it, it means the car has been driven like a
Porsche
and not a Honda Accord.
I drive in sport as well, I think these cars rev so fast I remember how easy it was to hit the limiter the first week I owned it, you should take it to the track at least once, if you do a PCA event you will have a instructor that will keep both you and your car safe in your comfort level, your yellow car makes me miss my first CS, it was a 2008.
No, wheel size doesn’t matter for engine revs, just the speedometer reading.
The other way to get to the redline is downshifting, when the revs at a speed in the higher gear causes too many in the lower gear. Say you go from 5th to 2nd, the differential will be large, for example, 4000–>8000rpm you will have exceeded the red line with no way for the rev limiter to help. Many an engine has gone ‘BANG’ because of this, especially old
911
’s with the vague gear linkage.
Sent from my
iPad
using Tapatalk
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.