15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHC4 Manual - Looking good!
Leading reported evidence
Fill arches out
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If it were my car I'd probably put some 7/15mm spacers on to fill the arches out.
Leading evidence: 'Fill arches out' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill arches out' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I quite like the look of this:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2001-POR...735798?hash=item239c653cf6:g:Ld4AAOSwAtlarDTp
Seems reasonable?
A bit of character, I can see myself swinging towards the 'early headlamp' brigade :lol:
Ahhh ok, I thought you were :fisherman:
I will say this, the dude does take a nice picture.
Worth having a read of this though if you're serious about the car
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=125972&highlight=modern+classic
It's not for me, happy with what I have 8)
I just like to keep an eye in, what's out and about you know.
Part of my checklist was 996.2 due to the headlamps
but I have to say I have found myself liking the mk1 style - defo getting better with age, and this one would tick a few boxes for me but wasn't aware of anything about the seller at all :nooo:
Yeah I like to keep an eye out too. Like you I'm also becoming a big fan of the 996.1.
I think that Pinky guy who designed it was ahead of his time, its taken quite a while for people to generally appreciate how good it looks.
I'd go for a GT3 kitted 996.1 C2 Manual with the GT3 2 piece wheels. Any colour, wouldn't be fussy.
That looks superb! Congrats! :thumb:
Exactly what I'm on about. Funny that its taken 15 years or so to look just right stylistically, even more so with the aerokit.
If it were my car I'd probably put some 7/15mm spacers on to fill the arches out. As it stands the wheels look a little tucked in. Wheel spacing is one of the things they've definitely improved with the 991 I think.
Regardless, its lovely :thumb:
I think an aerokitted 996.1 is just spot on, especially at the GT3 ride height.
Funnily enough, until a few years ago, I really disliked the 996, but now I love them!