fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

C4 Manual - Looking good!

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHC4 Manual - Looking good!

Leading reported evidence

Fill arches out

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If it were my car I'd probably put some 7/15mm spacers on to fill the arches out.

C4 Manual - Looking good!
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Fill arches out' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill arches out' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 15 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Fill arches out

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If it were my car I'd probably put some 7/15mm spacers on to fill the arches out.

C4 Manual - Looking good!
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I quite like the look of this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2001-POR...735798?hash=item239c653cf6:g:Ld4AAOSwAtlarDTp Seems reasonable? A bit of character, I can see myself swinging towards the 'early headlamp' brigade :lol:

POST 2Original post

You're joking, right? You've seen who the seller is? :dont know:

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I'm not in the know like you boys :eh!: Just caught my eye :dont know:

POST 4Original post

Ahhh ok, I thought you were :fisherman: I will say this, the dude does take a nice picture. Worth having a read of this though if you're serious about the car http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=125972&highlight=modern+classic

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

It's not for me, happy with what I have 8) I just like to keep an eye in, what's out and about you know. Part of my checklist was 996.2 due to the headlamps but I have to say I have found myself liking the mk1 style - defo getting better with age, and this one would tick a few boxes for me but wasn't aware of anything about the seller at all :nooo:

POST 6Original post

Re-arrange the following words into a well known phrase or saying: bearth, wide, it, give, a! Save yourself a boatload of grief. Cheers, Keith.

POST 7Original post

Yeah I like to keep an eye out too. Like you I'm also becoming a big fan of the 996.1. I think that Pinky guy who designed it was ahead of his time, its taken quite a while for people to generally appreciate how good it looks. I'd go for a GT3 kitted 996.1 C2 Manual with the GT3 2 piece wheels. Any colour, wouldn't be fussy.

POST 8Original post

Me too, recently purchased this car, I personally reckon the aero 996.1 looks better than the 996,2

POST 10Original post

That looks superb! Congrats! :thumb: Exactly what I'm on about. Funny that its taken 15 years or so to look just right stylistically, even more so with the aerokit. If it were my car I'd probably put some 7/15mm spacers on to fill the arches out. As it stands the wheels look a little tucked in. Wheel spacing is one of the things they've definitely improved with the 991 I think. Regardless, its lovely :thumb:

POST 11Original post

spacers are on the to do list, as well as a momo 07 steering wheel

POST 12Original post

I think an aerokitted 996.1 is just spot on, especially at the GT3 ride height. Funnily enough, until a few years ago, I really disliked the 996, but now I love them!

POST 13Original post

Ian - you're becoming a picture *****! :grin: :grin: :thumb:

POST 15 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Stunning Ian. Stunning :thumbs:

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.