15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGT4's car in 911uk.com banner
Leading reported evidence
Use ?
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use ?' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use ?' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Shhh! We were trying not to mention.
Ironic it was the day he bought a Ferrari he gets the ultimate 911uk honour
c:
Personally I'd like to see a nice blue 996 4S up there....cant recall having seen one of those in over 4 years. Now who's got one Admin can use :?:
Well spotted!
You're the first to actually acknowledge it.
So, Thanks :thumb:
I guess my own plug doesn't count:
http://www.911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=57835&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=50
Not being paid, I am flattered and honored that Sundeep approached me to have GT4 as a 911UK "banner car" :worship:
And I need to thank Rich (ResB) for P'shopping the original to blend with the background.
It actually went live at: 12:23am October 13 2010.
weekend supply of Twi
x
but we've dug deep and negotiated some extra Chunky Kit Cats
another fine job by ResB with the imagery
but it's been a while since we had a MK1 996 on the banner, actually a long time and I can't think of no better car than GT4's, an outstanding example of that (and dare I say it) 'classic' 996 :thumb:
