21 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHEngine Problems
Reported or suspected cause
ecu
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
After several days of research, it was discovered that the problem was the ECU.
Leading evidence: 'ecu' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'ecu' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Once that was replaced and reprogrammed, the car ran fine.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They offered 60% goodwill and I pay for the labour on repairing a car that was defective for a considerable time.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If so, the problem is probably mechanical (piston ring, blown head gasket, bad valve seat/seal, etc) and so repair may be a bit pricey.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would incline to have it repaired with less fuss as possible, but you sure have a good case for dispute.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Why is it that the internal damage to the engine is so minimal that if the timing change broke when the downshift from "6th to 2nd", was there much more catastrophic damage?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all
first post and its not on a good issue - i need some advice/opinions from others.
My
Cayman
is just over 3 years old, just outside its warranty, however car broken down last weekend - misfiring was the cause, as the car wouldnt start.
I have just been told that one of the cylinders in the car isnt firing up and is in effect broken. Has anyone with a
cayman
or
boxster
experienced this issue before and how did they go about repairing it?
thanks
It is not clear from your statements above, but if you have not done so already, you should start by taking to car to a trusted
Porsche
mechanic and have them see what codes have been stored. They will then be able to tell you what repairs would be necessary. There could be any number of causes for a misfire on one cylinder such as an issue with a spark plug, ignition coil, fuel injector, cabling, etc. If the misfires are not limited to one cylinder, then there could be even more causes.
A mechanic that can pull codes from a
Porsche
will be your best bet.
Welcome aboard.
I'd be a little surprised if the on-board diagnostics monitor compression. Did the technician manually measure/confirm there is no compression? If so, the problem is probably mechanical (piston ring, blown head gasket, bad valve seat/seal, etc) and so repair may be a bit pricey. I hope you find it is just a coil of something easier. Good luck.
You said it would not start. That is inconsistent with one piston not compressing. The car should still start and run roughly. Would you elaborate on when you noticed the failure and exactly how it manifested?
Kenkg the car when it initially broken down would not turn over. The codes that came up on diagnostics was a broken camshaft actuator and positioning sensor, these have been replaced, then the mechanics managed to turn the car over the car sounded rough they did a compression test to find that cylinder # 6 had no compression. That in essence is the issue
This sounds similar to a problem I heard about on an 08
Boxster
2.7L. Not my car, but the owner took it to the dealer complaining of misfiring and /or running rough.
It turns out one of the cylinders wasn't firing. After several days of research, it was discovered that the problem was the ECU.
Once that was replaced and reprogrammed, the car ran fine.
Have you taken the car back to an official
Porsche
centre, or is this being done by an independent? In the case of a relatively new car like this, even if it is out of warranty, I would strongly suggest that you should be dealing with an OPC and not someone else.
Even out of warranty, there is a process within
Porsche
UK to offer goodwill in the unfortunate event that this turns out to be something serious. There are various factors they will look at, such as ...
Did you buy the car new, from Porsche
Has it been modified or damaged
Has it been serviced by them, according to the schedule
Depending on the answers to these questions (and others) they may help you out. Equally they may not, but you won't know till you ask. This is definitely well worth exploring, arguably even more so than diagnosing the fault.
I bought the car from new from
Porsche
, its hasnt been modified or damaged and it has been serviced by them according to their schedule. Is there a
Porsche
rep on this forum who can give me guidance on this?
Hi John
Yes, I was awaiting the response from
Porsche
on their goodwill scheme before responding.
Porsche
rang me today to inform me that the timing chain snapped due to downshifting from 6th to 2nd gear, which caused over-revving, which in turn caused the chain to snap. As a result they will not undertake any of the repairs under their scheme, and that I am liable for all costs.
You can probably understand my shock and dismay at this response from
Porsche
, and the fobbing off I just received. To invest a lot of money in a top performing high end car to have it fully serviced by
Porsche
, to then get this response is beyond belief. There are several fundamental factors that
Porsche
have stated which are wholly inaccurate. Firstly their technical diagnosis was "downshifting from 6th to 2nd" - well this is impossible as my
Cayman
DOES NOT have a 6th gear!!!!! Also the car worked fine and was driven to W1, where it broke down - so anyone who has driven through Central London, will know that getting out of 3rd gear is a practical impossibility. Why didn't the timing chain snap when the downshift was supposed to have taken place, rather than returning to the car, starting it, putting the car in to 1st gear and as soon as the car sets off, it breaks down? Why is it that the internal damage to the engine is so minimal that if the timing change broke when the downshift from "6th to 2nd", was there much more catastrophic damage?
Of course I will ask to see the data that shows exact dates and times and then use an independent specialist to confirm their data.
1. The good news is that the timing chain is all that requires replacing & you should be on your way again.
2. The bad news is that your dealer is full of bullsh!t. You have correctly stated your car doesn't have a 6th gear, and I have never heard of a timing chain breaking as appose to a belt, although they can stretch...
I would incline to have it repaired with less fuss as possible, but you sure have a good case for dispute.
The question is does your ECU show large overrevs just prior to the engine quitting? If so, then yes the repairs are on you because something you did caused the car to go way into the over rev ranges. (ranges 1-3 on your car are not that serious, anything range 4 and above
Porsche
will likely disclaim coverage)
So what you need to see is your over rev report from the ECU and see when they occurred. If the report shows over revs months or years before then that should not be a problem, if it shows high (range 4 and above) over revs within seconds/minutes/hours of the engine failing you will have your warranty disclaimed for this issue.
Timing chains have broken for other reasons, but if you have high over revs
Porsche
will automatically disclaim whether the over revs caused the chain to break or not. So again you need to see the over rev report.
As a side note, with the new
PDK
transmisison overrevs are supposed to be impossible and thus
Porsche
could never disclaim a broken timing chain on a new
Cayman
for over revs, maybe for something else though you never know...
BTW if you missed a shift, say 5th to 3rd and over revved the motor you'd know it, so only you know whether you did that or not, although
Porsche
can tell is "someone" did using the ECU readout.
There was no high revving what so ever prior to the chain snapping - I live in London, close to Central London, so really there was no opportunity to over rev the engine - the car was working fine, even up to the point of when the car was parked. It was upon returning to the car, starting it, sliding it in to 1st gear, that the chain then broke. The car moved no more than 10 yards. I have requested the data from the DME and will get it verified from an independent specialist and go from there. Suffice to say, Porsche's behaviour in this instance has been quite disgusting. To even state it was a downshift from 6th to 2nd gear, when my car doesnt have a 6th gear, clearly shows that their diagnosis processing is flawed.
Update: Spoken with
Porsche
this morning - seems like the timing chain snapping was down to the 'scavenger pump' being faulty. So its appears that it was a mechanical defect,
Porsche
Tech Dept are doing further tests.
More to follow I am sure
OK update for you to consider.
Porsche
are offering a partial goodwill, on a known mechanical defect. They offered 60% goodwill and I pay for the labour on repairing a car that was defective for a considerable time. I am pretty disgusted with
Porsche
UK - they wont stand by a product - this isnt a maintenance issue, this is simply a bad part within their engine. They refused so far to give me the data for the 'over-revving' that didnt actually take place. Simply put this isnt a maintenance issue, this is a mechanical one and one that
Porsche
are responsible for.
I am now taking legal advice on what my
next
moves are - i am not having them fob me off with partial goodwill. For a company that takes pride in its engines, this is a pretty poor response from them.