911uk

Health Warning

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHHealth Warning

Reported or suspected cause

raw acceleration

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause: 1
Suspected cause: 0
Reported fixes

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster
I have to be honest and say truthfully I don't think I will notice 85% of the time but in my case it was the raw acceleration that sold me on the change coupled with the fact I think I found a bit of a gem.
Original post Read captured discussion
Health Warning
Outcome qualification: Negation, uncertainty or missing explicit repair resolution overrides the raw extraction signal.

Frequently discussed work

Replace coupled

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I have to be honest and say truthfully I don't think I will notice 85% of the time but in my case it was the raw acceleration that sold me on the change coupled with the fact I think I found a bit of a gem.
Original post Read captured discussion
Health Warning

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'raw acceleration' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'raw acceleration' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace coupled' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Replace coupled

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I have to be honest and say truthfully I don't think I will notice 85% of the time but in my case it was the raw acceleration that sold me on the change coupled with the fact I think I found a bit of a gem.
Original post Read captured discussion
Health Warning

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace coupled

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I have to be honest and say truthfully I don't think I will notice 85% of the time but in my case it was the raw acceleration that sold me on the change coupled with the fact I think I found a bit of a gem.
Original post Read captured discussion
Health Warning

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

raw acceleration

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause: 1
Suspected cause: 0
Reported fixes

Read evidence and context

Discussions that suspect a cause: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster
I have to be honest and say truthfully I don't think I will notice 85% of the time but in my case it was the raw acceleration that sold me on the change coupled with the fact I think I found a bit of a gem.
Original post Read captured discussion
Health Warning
Outcome qualification: Negation, uncertainty or missing explicit repair resolution overrides the raw extraction signal.

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 1 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Ladies and Gents I think this site should come with a health warning. All your amazing knowledge and experiences can have a devastating effect on the bank balance! a mere 6 months after joining the Porsche fraternity 996 C4s Cab, i have found myself lusting after more. As a result I am soon to pick up an upgrade: Or to mis-quote the old Wall Street, Greed is Good, but envy is dangerous!

POST 2Original post

Very nice :thumb:

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks GT4, have all the fun of prepping it Grill etc and shifting the C4S! Have requested the bank deny me access to funds for at least a month! excluding 99 RON

POST 4Original post

very 8)

POST 5Original post

Awesome Looks the muts nuts mate! If you are ever looking for any new employees I would gladly assist....... Happy motoring...

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Classic bossman, if only you knew what i do!!!! the closest i get to Wall Street is the cinema! c: Thanks for the comments, very excited will post some proper shots when I pick her up. Think I might be in time to make the Fairmile in the evening

POST 7Original post

I have a C4s x51 cab and My dilemma is maybe I should have held off for a turbo ? How does it compare to the C4S... From what I have seen they seen to be about 4 to 6 k over a similar c4s ? :?:

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Bentley300, I have to be honest and say truthfully I don't think I will notice 85% of the time but in my case it was the raw acceleration that sold me on the change coupled with the fact I think I found a bit of a gem. Haven't tried the x51 but the tt has the x50 and ceramics so big lift in power and the brakes when not cold are fabulous! Will let you know how I get on after I have a chance to live with her. Definitely understand the conundrum but has been a lifelong dream to have a 911 turbo :cigar: and finally made it

POST 9Original post

Congrats Jester welcome to the 'I've always wanted a 911 Turbo' fraternity. Looks like a quality car. Like you say the raw power is tremendous. Let us know what its like with the top down (the raw power that is). :thumb:

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.