9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew arrival...me and the car!
Leading reported evidence
Run like a dream
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The car had done 3,000 in the 2 years before i had it and i swear was the worse for it as all the problems were in the first 4 weeks of ownership and I suspect as a result of it sitting around yearning to be royally thrashed every now and then....since using it it has run like a dream with only a routine service along the way
Leading evidence: 'Run like a dream' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run like a dream' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Someone who uses their car as Porsche intended gets :thumbs: from me but 19,000 miles is a lot of miles in 6 months
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Run like a dream
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The car had done 3,000 in the 2 years before i had it and i swear was the worse for it as all the problems were in the first 4 weeks of ownership and I suspect as a result of it sitting around yearning to be royally thrashed every now and then....since using it it has run like a dream with only a routine service along the way
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T191851Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Just wanted to say hello to all on this forum....Hello .
Been reading for a while now having aquired my turbo in March this year and mightily impressed with the level of knowledge contained. It is good to have somewhere to go when the paranoia sets in every time the car makes a new and interesting noise (most of them imagined along with the imagined catastrophic effect on the wallet)
So far so good (actually OMG this thing is proper quick) with minor MAF and diverter problems + obligatory replacement rads (mesh now on car) all done on warranty.
I have come back to Porsche after a 4 year break and am having to tell myself every day that i haven't bought the wrong car, reason for that....... I've done 19,000 miles in it since March...drive it every day, committed to it being my only car and to never think about depreciation or the price of super unleaded!!!
Just one question....Mad or not???? :dont know:
Thanks for comments.........head says 'David for christ sake buy a cheap diesel or nick your sons mini more often'
heart says....put foot down and enjoy the ride...
The car had done 3,000 in the 2 years before i had it and i swear was the worse for it as all the problems were in the first 4 weeks of ownership and I suspect as a result of it sitting around yearning to be royally thrashed every now and then....since using it it has run like a dream with only a routine service along the way
Welcome Orch1 :thumbs: 19k miles in 7 months is a heck of a lot but totally reflects your enjoyment of the car! Any nice pictures for us to ogle at? We never tire of looking at pics especially if they're Turbos.
~ Maxie
My second 911..... i had a fleeting affair with a 996 carrera 2 about 4 years ago but i broke her heart :sad: (small matter of a tree jumping out on me whilst i was exploring the rear weight biased handling characteristics!!)
I had the 'buy an early 997 or get a 996 turbo' debate and decided on the basis of no such thing as too fast and the inhenrent strength of the turbo engine...no regrets as yet
