6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPorsche Engine replaced under Warranty
Leading reported evidence
Replace engine
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Whilst researching the vehcile's history, I discovered that Porsche GB replaced the engine under a 'Goodwill' gesture in June 2005 when the vehicle had only covered 27k.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would say if you have a replacement engine then enjoy it and don't worry, just keep an eye on the levels and make sure you check coolant levels and oil levels with the dipstick not the unreliable oil level sensor in the car.
Leading evidence: 'Replace engine' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check coolant levels and oil levels' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would say if you have a replacement engine then enjoy it and don't worry, just keep an eye on the levels and make sure you check coolant levels and oil levels with the dipstick not the unreliable oil level sensor in the car.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I am yet to check yet, but I suspect that I will have a new engine number.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They would have used a MY2005 (Aug 2004 revision engine).
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check coolant levels and oil levels
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I would say if you have a replacement engine then enjoy it and don't worry, just keep an eye on the levels and make sure you check coolant levels and oil levels with the dipstick not the unreliable oil level sensor in the car.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Whilst researching the vehcile's history, I discovered that Porsche GB replaced the engine under a 'Goodwill' gesture in June 2005 when the vehicle had only covered 27k.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All,
I have a late 2001 996 facelift Carerra 4.
Whilst researching the vehcile's history, I discovered that Porsche GB replaced the engine under a 'Goodwill' gesture in June 2005 when the vehicle had only covered 27k. Although I was initially wary of this fact, upon speaking with experts far and wide, I was advised that this could only be a good thing. I am yet to check yet, but I suspect that I will have a new engine number.
Anyway, my question is to know whether Porsche replacement engines from 2005 had the bigger, more robust Intermediate Shaft (IMS), or were they simply a replacement of the same engine? I have read various reports on this and cannot seem to get a consistent answer. I'm not so sure Porsche would offer this information. Unless someone knows otherwise?
I have also read that the IMS problem was still an issue on the first generation 997, and didn't really get sorted until around 2007?
Any knowledge/advice on this would be most appreciated.
Thank you. :?:
Throughout the 996 range the engines went through loads and loads of minor revisions. You can see this reflected though the part numbers.
In terms of your fitment, it would almost certainly be a late 996 model as suggested above.
Unfortunately the IMS and cracking problems still exist on the 996 and 997.1 engines. It appears that 997 engines also have a problem with cylinder 6, due to lack of coolant flow, so perhaps the later 996 engines are slightly better - although that's hugely subjective, especially as the 997s have some uprated parts within them.
997.2 engines are supposed to be much improved, but it's too early to say with any certainty.
Cheers,
GD
I think the sweet-spot would be a last-of-the-line 997.1 Turbos or GT3s.
Proper GT1 block derived.
All this 3.8 nonsense (with or without DFI) does my head in.
HI GD,
I had this whole thread going on the IMS shaft failure for 996/997's after being advised of the potential pitfalls. See the link below:
http://www.911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=57635
I spoke to Hartech at length about this issue. The most important thing to remember is that even if they were to give you a lifetime service plan, they still are not of the opinion that it is necessary to change the Intermediate Shaft and bearing, as the problem is not consistent enough to warrant it. In the wide amount of cases the 996 is a solid piece of operating machinery.
That all said, if you are unlucky enough to suffer from this issue then they can rebuild your engine for less than the price of a new one, and make sure the replacement shaft and bearing are aftermarket stronger components.
One of the guys on 911UK with a beautiful car had this happen to him - (SpectralUK). The engine was replaced and he has the most astounding example of the 911..he knows how to drive that thing, and it knows how to bite him back!
I would say if you have a replacement engine then enjoy it and don't worry, just keep an eye on the levels and make sure you check coolant levels and oil levels with the dipstick not the unreliable oil level sensor in the car.
:thumbs: :bandit:
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.