6 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhy's 991 GT3 Owners Vol 2 been deleted ?? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Reported or suspected cause
main reason why i didnt give in
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
And I have to say it was the main reason why I didnt give in when waiting for the car for the best part of 18 months...
Why's 991 GT3 Owners Vol 2 been deleted ?? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'main reason why i didnt give in' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'main reason why i didnt give in' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
If you see the other thread, it was due to technical problems.
Why's 991 GT3 Owners Vol 2 been deleted ?? - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T003124Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Despite some obsessive-compulsive-deviation on values in recent months I found it pretty useful and really liked the wealth of information and access to fellow ownership expériences..
And I have to say it was the main reason why I didnt give in when waiting for the car for the best part of 18 months...
So any reason moderators ?
RSVP911 said:
rosino said:
Despite some obsessive-compulsive-deviation on values in recent months I found it pretty useful and really liked the wealth of information and access to fellow ownership expériences..
And I have to say it was the main reason why I didnt give in when waiting for the car for the best part of 18 months...
So any reason moderators ?
I think this may have been my fault - I'm really sorry .
I put a post on after the Vanuatu Cyclone Pam disaster - do you remember Macca , well it turns out he lives there and he set up a charity donation site to collect money for the locals who lost everything - well I posted a link to it and after this the site was shut down - maybe a co incidence but after this I looked at the posting rules and saw that this was a no no - I wrote to PH a couple of times to ask for my post to be deleted so the thread could be re instated but unfortunately I got nowhere . If anyone remembers Macca and want to donate to help him , then please PM me and I'll forward you the link - will not be posting it on here again . Sorry again for doing this - I also found it a great read - well most of the time
Magic919 said:
If you see the other thread, it was due to technical problems. It'll be back once they sort it, but locked. The replacement is running.
I know that's the word on the street - but I posted and then checked my post 2 mins later and , bang , it had gone - I've been in hiding ever since for fear of fellow poster abuse - had a beer / epiphany moment last night and fessed up -
RSVP911 said:
I know that's the word on the street - but I posted and then checked my post 2 mins later and , bang , it had gone - I've been in hiding ever since for fear of fellow poster abuse - had a beer / epiphany moment last night and fessed up -
I doubt that was the cause as a Moderator could have just removed your post and left the thread.
Equally if a Moderator felt the thread had gone off course he could have deleted multiple posts right back to the point where the thread was acceptable.
5517 said:
I doubt that was the cause as a Moderator could have just removed your post and left the thread.
Equally if a Moderator felt the thread had gone off course he could have deleted multiple posts right back to the point where the thread was acceptable.
Good to know - thanks for that
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
