15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHVideo academy Crash Porsche 996 Turbo
Reported or suspected cause
dropping the left rear
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
Looks like that was caused by dropping the left rear on the grass / dirt...
Leading evidence: 'dropping the left rear' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'dropping the left rear' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Run wide unnecessarily' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I suspect he was staring at the yellow car as to why it's stopped rather than where he was heading.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
He's not trying to steer out of trouble at all before the dirt, just lets it run wide unnecessarily.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T075545Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Watched it a couple of times trying to work it out; looks like he's got on the power hard, and the back end has slowly started coming round, then rather than let the car sort itself out he's either braked or let off the gas and it's snapped round the other way?
Weird in a 4wd, whatever happened... :dont know:
Difficult one - if you look at 31secs, the NSR tyre wall is deformed at the bottom - which suggests to me he took a daft line, stepped the NSR into the rough, tyre got damaged on the inner of the wheel and deflated, he came back onto the smooth but had limited traction with no NSR tyre - slide which he didn't catch and into the banking. The rest is a trip to the bodyshop....
Expensive mistake
Hi Tom :thumbs: didn't realise you were on here too (I was the one who chased you down in your speedster on the island back in August)
Oh no - they ALL do that - the newer ones just do it faster and more expensively
Looks like NSR caught dirt as schwarz993 said, driver corrected the slide with opposite steering, got traction back which shoved them into the wall.
First reaction was how much for a front end damage I wonder, expensive.
Spot on I'd say.
Span up on the dirt and kicked back on the grippier tarmac.
I wonder if the slow moving yellow car distracted the driver making his line wide and touching the dirt.
Expensive mistake, but definately a mistake in my eyes.
:nooo:
Looking from 0:24 onwards he's taken pretty poor lines but it really seems like he might have been anywhere but concentrating. He's not trying to steer out of trouble at all before the dirt, just lets it run wide unnecessarily. Obviously once he hits the dirt he's yanked it back and spun it. I suspect he was staring at the yellow car as to why it's stopped rather than where he was heading. Muppet award.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
