15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH40K plus C4S???
Leading reported evidence
Use &page=1
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Am I the only one who thinks that, if you are going to try and take the pi$$ and advertise a car like that for that price you'd at least get the cracked reflector replaced first....
Leading evidence: 'Use &page=1' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace first' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Am I the only one who thinks that, if you are going to try and take the pi$$ and advertise a car like that for that price you'd at least get the cracked reflector replaced first....
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace first
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Am I the only one who thinks that, if you are going to try and take the pi$$ and advertise a car like that for that price you'd at least get the cracked reflector replaced first....
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classi...nesearchad=Nearly New&onesearchad=Used&page=1
That is getting into Turbo money now ... I know Spring may be finally here but ... ????
Ridiculous, nothig exceptional about it.
Seems that a lot of dealers are way unrealistic with the C4S prices at the moment lots of cars above the 30k which seems to stay on there for ages.
I was genuilly interested in the following car myself. But after enquiries, the car has 2 long service history gaps and no real signs of regulr oil changes. Only 3 stamps from a now closed non porsche specialist garage in NI, no IMS upgrade, no clutch and no warranty provided...seems a little crazy.
https://www.pistonheads.com/classif...utely-stunning-porsche-911-carrera-4s/8458709
That will hang around - not even a manual. I would say it's about £10k too much and only then assuming it is perfect (which I doubt it is). They certainly have some very expensive cars and lots of Porsches, so perhaps they are hoping someone with more money than sense (there is no shortage of money round there) sees it as an "investment" Porsche and get caught up in the sales bullsh*t...
How about a £50k C4S here, with 15k miles and a 5 year service gap 2008 to 2013 and last serviced in 2015:
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2004-Por...129545?hash=item4d601f0d49:g:wmoAAOSwULNZgEMV
Evening
Im no porsche expert but im very active on the web looking around & ive noticed that the dealers have started to ask higher prices for the c4s, not sure if they know something we dont? some out there are silly money but someone must be buying.
PDCC4S
I remember when a few dealers started asking big money for 993s. I thought it would never catch on, being as I'd previously sold a lovely low miles manual Targa for £26k... :sad:
The best examples might fetch decent money... the 996 4S was the last 'turbo bodied' 911 in the genre of the 3.2 Supersport, 964 Anniversary and 993 S so has some cachet if nothing like the rarity... then others may get pulled up a bit. Which would be no bad thing as it helps me justify my ongoing programme of works to mine!
Don't really care what dealers ask for them. If they fetch the prices, good for them.
The 15k mile car was in the H&H auction yesterday at guide price £40-£50k and wasn't sold as it only got to £38k...
https://online.handh.co.uk/m/lot-de...ot/40023/?url=/m/view-auctions/catalog/id/84/
Am I the only one who thinks that, if you are going to try and take the pi$$ and advertise a car like that for that price you'd at least get the cracked reflector replaced first....
It just goes to show the contempt that some dealers have towards buyers
c:
Osh
