37 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMy 996.2 with Aero 1
Reported or suspected cause
kit
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'kit' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'kit' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean indeed' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
37 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
6SpeedOnline: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all, I know, I know if you have an Aero kit you need a big wing. I have a 2002 996 with the "angry lights" instead of the "fried eggie" does anyone else out there have the "angry lights" with the Aero 1? It was factory installed, I bought the car and traced the history. The previous owner bought the car and the dealership added all the options, crest on seats, full out Aero 1 body kit, Techart pentagon steering wheel (Alacantra), yellow brakes etc etc. I like the look of the duck tail. Please if you have a 911 with "angry lights" with Aero kit 1 please post, would like to see other 996's that have this variation. (Car lowered with H&R Springs and 19 Inch BBS dipped in satin black)
Out of curiosity, is a 996 mk1 c2 with a gt3 aero kit considered riced? I mean it looks awesome but I don't want to buy a car that's pretending to be something it's not. I'd like to hear your opinions
No! In my opinion "Riced" is a Muffler Bomb, 10,000 Logo Stickers all over the car and horrible colors.
The Red Aero Kit you posted looks great, nice and clean!
On a mk1 gt3 it's a standard body.
On a regular 996, it was I believe close to 8k usd option. There are aftermarket replica parts though which look just like the OEMs.
Dealer might have installed that rear ducktail but doubt it as it's not a Porsche part. Looks great though and I'd love to buy one if I knew it wouldn't take hours of sanding and cutting to make it fit my 996 C2.
I don't think it's riced at all. In fact, last weekend I hopped on the interstate and there was an aqua colored 996 going by, and at the next exit, a speed yellow with the aero kit got on, so we were all three going down the road for a bit. The more I was next to it, I really liked the aero kit at speed. All of us were >75, so we all had our tails up, but the fixed wing in the back with the side skirts, etc., just made a very aggressive looking car, I gained a new appreciation for it, and didn't think it was riced at all.
DS
I didn't know germans ate rice...
Lol jks
Its a porsche. Pretty hard to rice it out imo.
For example: I got a gt2 996 kit on my c2 with led drls and people think its entirely oem. One guy even said he thought it was an 09...
Mine was a factory C2 Aero car, but it was just looking so dated in my opinion and I wasn't a big fan of the taco wing look.
So, I decided to upgrade the overall look of my car to something more current. But some people really dig the 996.1 aero kit cars, which is cool.
Cheers
Aaron
Is it just me or from a side profile with the OEM kit, it looks a little off. Meaning the front and sides are low and the rear seems way to high. What are your guys opinions on these rear add on?
Factory vs. Add-ons
