fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

996 C2 rear wheel hp ? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
14 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH996 C2 rear wheel hp ? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Test few 2.5 boxsters at just 165 @ wheels

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

But if you think the 996 is poor we have also tested a few 2.5 Boxsters at just 165 @ wheels.

996 C2 rear wheel hp ? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Test few 2.5 boxsters at just 165 @ wheels' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test few 2.5 boxsters at just 165 @ wheels' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 14 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Test last year and all seems fine

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I'm only at 97k miles but I had a leakdown and compression test last year and all seems fine on that front.

996 C2 rear wheel hp ? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Test few 2.5 boxsters at just 165 @ wheels

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

But if you think the 996 is poor we have also tested a few 2.5 Boxsters at just 165 @ wheels.

996 C2 rear wheel hp ? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Test last year and all seems fine

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I'm only at 97k miles but I had a leakdown and compression test last year and all seems fine on that front.

996 C2 rear wheel hp ? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Isn't it usually about 15% less than flywheel? So maybe 255-272 BHP?

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

If so then a simple 250hp 944 turbo with a £200 Guru Racing kit is more powerful (and lighter) : I've driven such a car, it's AWESOME. To sum it up, it drives like : - a 944S2/968 between 2000 and 3000 rpm - a stock 951 250bhp on full boost between 3000 and 4000 rpm - a rocket from 4000 rpm up to the redline. I need one

POST 3Original post

Most 996 3.4s struggle to post more than 250bhp at the wheels whereas a good 964RS with 290 flywheel will post 265+ at the wheels. But if you think the 996 is poor we have also tested a few 2.5 Boxsters at just 165 @ wheels. Every car is different, there is no point trying to assign % losses between models as there are too many factors affecting performance, like tyres, tyre pressure, gearbox, gearbox oil and temperatures.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Colin, I was not trying to make any serious point except that I find interesting that a more than 10 years-old Porsche with minimum budget can offer a significantly better power/weight ratio than a brand new one. In other words, no need to take my words with a grain of salt >> Edited by Thom on Wednesday 25th June 12:32

POST 5Original post

Thom, You must be feeling guilty today, my post was a general one and in no way specifically directed at your comments or power figures for the 944 Turbo (which seems impressive, it has to be said). It's just that I get a little fed up with assumptions about power losses and the like, every car is different, every dyno is different, but in general as long as the dyno is accurate the rear wheel power figures are generally the uncorrected on-the-day result, so as such are a pretty useful comparison as they can not lie.

POST 6Original post

Thats why I put a question mark after my assumption rather than stating it as fact

POST 7Original post

Thom, is this the Guru $290 chips plus Reliaboost option? 285bhp and 338 lbft at the wheels seems very high for such a reasonable outlay, are you sure that graph isn't showing the figures at the flywheel? Even if it is, it seems like good value because most rolling road remaps here in the UK talk about 280-90 bhp at the flywheel for a £450ish cost. Hsve you been in this car or seen that graph in another forum somewhere? Cheers, Paul

POST 8Original post

I would think that the figures shown in the graph are indeed flywheel figures, not at the rear wheels. In my experience most RR operators give you a graph showing the 'corrected' figures. Corrected is in quote marks because they are really a estimate, not factual.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Yes, that's the kit. I assume these figures are measured at the rear wheels : before being in and trying the car of my friend I went in a genuine 300bhp Turbo but the car with the GR kit feels significantly faster, even though it is a road car with a 300lbs weight handicap compared to the Cup. The graphs do not come from my friend's car but judging from the power & torque delivery compared to that of the Cup I would say this engine gets out more power than the Cup's 300bhp, thus validating to a certain extent the graph I posted below. edited to add : boost is the same as on the Cup at 1.1 bar (16 psi). >> Edited by Thom on Thursday 26th June 09:51

POST 10Original post

Well Thom, I've spent the last few weeks reading a lot about GuruRacing.net on Rennlist and a few other Porsche Forums. All the feedback has been good, and I have exchanged a few emails with the owner Danno which has also given me a good feeling So..........tonight I just ordered his chips and Reliaboost for $290 US. After import taxes and VAT it should work out at around £250 GB. I had been looking at a Dual Port Wastegate and a rolling road remap here in the UK for a total of £1000, but if this 1/4 price alternative gets me close to the 300bhp that the expensive option would have yielded then I will be happy. I'll keep you informed.

POST 11 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I'm pretty sure you will be pleased with the improvement. Please make sure your engine & turbo are fine before installing the kit; the increase in performance is so impressive you may at first wonder if the engine can be capable of bearing it ... (The engine of my friend has 240,000 kms but also a brand new head) >> Edited by Thom on Monday 7th July 16:34

POST 12Original post

Thanks for the warning Thom. I'm only at 97k miles but I had a leakdown and compression test last year and all seems fine on that front. Speaking to many 944T owners with raised boost it seems to be the head gasket that goes first but the Turbocharger is basically sound. If it does go then that is perfect excuse for an uprated version that spools up quicker but provides a bit more boost. I'll get my wallet The GuruRacing stuff should have shipped yesterday

POST 13 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

You are welcome Paul, please keep me informed on how you get on !

POST 14 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

What would the rear wheels power output be for a 300 or 320 bhp engine ?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.