28 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnyone using Castrol Edge 0W40 or Motul 300V 0w40?
Leading reported evidence
Run m1 0-40
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
My car is both my personal and track vehicle and for the first few years I had it I ran M1 0-40.
Anyone using Castrol Edge 0W40 or Motul 300V 0w40?
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Run m1 0-40' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'fill tube being' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend by flat-6' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Anyone using Castrol Edge 0W40 or Motul 300V 0w40?
Use dt40 most of the time
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Anyone using Castrol Edge 0W40 or Motul 300V 0w40?
Use gibbs dt-40
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Anyone using Castrol Edge 0W40 or Motul 300V 0w40?
Use tws in my e39 m5, and i agree
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I used the TWS in my E39 M5, and I agree with using manufacturer recommended oil..
Anyone using Castrol Edge 0W40 or Motul 300V 0w40?
Recommend when your car was new
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Over time other oils have been developed that we have found to be more superior than what the mmanufacturer would have recommended when your car was new.
Anyone using Castrol Edge 0W40 or Motul 300V 0w40?
Run crap out of it
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
But I finally realized that, as I have been doing 7-9 D.E.s a season, running the crap out of it on R-compounds and, lately, slicks, it probably gets as much hard use as many club race cars.
Anyone using Castrol Edge 0W40 or Motul 300V 0w40?
Outcome qualification: Negation, uncertainty or missing explicit repair resolution overrides the raw extraction signal.
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
28 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 1 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
Its called "DT40", so just buy it and know that it solved many problems in the development of it.
Hey guys
I have been using
Castrol
in all my cars and
Motul
for motorcycles for the last 24 years.
Everything I find regarding Porsches says they highly recommend Mobile -1 oil.
I understand Oil company +
Porsche
factory corroboration but I can't find any Mobile-1 oils that are specifically formulated for
Porsche
engines, like the
Castrol
TWS series for
BMW
M engines.
Are any of you using the castor 0W40 or
Motul 300V
0w40?
I know oil questions are completely subjective and everyone has their preference. Just wondering if some of you have tried the
Castrol Edge
0W40
Thank you in advance
The 300v is a great oil, but from what I recall the lifecycle of the additive package is very short.
I prefer the
Motul
5w-40 Xcess, (and a 5w cold weight in general).
Another (superior) option to all of the above thoughts is Joe Gibbs DT40 developed by Jake Raby and Charles Navarro specifically for the flat six.
What you need to look for is that your oil of choice meets the
Porsche
A40 specification.
Mobil 1 0W-40
meets it, as does
Amsoil
5W-40 and
Castrol Edge
. There's plenty of other oils that meet it, too. Just search for
Porsche
A40 and you'll find the list out there on the interwebs.
Cheers,
Kevin
I haven't got very good experience with
Castrol edge
when I tried it in my previous cars.
I dont have any diagnostics or scientific evidence but it did loose its "smoothness" faster than the 2 below.
Could feel it more in my 4 cylinder engines as they arent inherently as smooth as the 6's.
So far the most suitable engine oils (for 10k-12k kms interval) have been Petronas Syntium (if its sold there) and
Mobil 1
(which I currently use in the 987).
I use
Castrol
TWS 10w60 in my
M3
. It's the only oil approved for that engine. For my
981
, I use
Mobil
0w40. Basically, I use whatever oil the manufacturer recommends since I don't have any hard data to do otherwise.
I used the TWS in my E39 M5, and I agree with using manufacturer recommended oil..
What I find interesting is that
BMW
M engines require especially formulated oil for said engines ( oils that go beyond the standard additives required by that Manufacturer) yet
Porsche
requires just the A40 standard and no additional/especially formulated oil for its engines. Dont get me wrong, I love not paying $15 a quart like i did for the TWS, but surely a decade+ old corroboration between Mobile and
Porsche
would have resulted in a formula suited for
Porsche
engines only.
I am not a chemical engineer so who knows...
Go ahead and beat on me. I use
Mobil 1
10-40. Spec is 5-40. Everybody goes 5 under with 0-40. It gets hot here and that just seems too thin for me. At 70k + miles I feel the bearing clearances are loose enough to flow 10-40.
When the engine is up to operating temp (i.e., about 210 degrees), 0w-40, 5w-40, and 10w-40 all flow like a SAE 40 weight oil. It's only when the engine is cold that the oils perform differently. The 0w-40 flows the easiest at cold temps, which is great to cover all the engine parts asap after a cold start.
Joe Gibbs 5w40 as recommended by Flat-6. Has more zinc or whatever the key additive is for lubricity. He will not guarantee his engines if they don't have Joe Gibbs oil in them. I don't have a Flat-6 build motor, but he also says, "if you want your motor to last, use this...even for stock motors."
I have an '06 CS with 106K miles that runs better than new.
:cheers:
The Joe Gibbs oil with the ZDDP whatever is good for engines but does not comply with the spec for the Porsche approved oil grade classification. Mobil 1 has oils for racing too, and for motorcycles and high mileage applications, with high ZDDP levels but they aren’t Porsche approved either since using them could damage the emission system.
Exxon pays the most to have the Mobil 1 sticker on Porsches compared to all the other manufacturers on the Porsche approved oil list. With so many manufacturers and oils on the list, it really comes down to personal preferences for whatever reason to pick a good synthetic. I've been using Redline for years and it’s not even on the approved list but it meets the approved oil grade classification.
I started with M1 0W40 early last year wiht 23k on 2007 car. I purchased the SC in Dec with oil change records, every 4000 miles. I noticed notable timing chain noise, then changed to
Castrol
5W-50 and the chain noise went away. Motor seems very happy with this oil, so I am buying more, not that I dislike M1, but my second oil change was with M1 5W-50 weight, which still had chain noise. I believe the
Castrol
has more ZDDP and other additives and is much more expensive than M1. I guess the long term use and any mantance problems will be the judge. I live in Seattle where the winter tempature is not severe, so start up is still ok. It takes a while to get the moisture out of the oil though, as measured by the oil gage. My engine burns very little oil between changes.
The other notion is the filtration and any potential oil sepage into the
IMS bearing
. This brings me to believe that 3500 miles is about as far as I want to go with oil changes. I also am changing to a Corvette screw on filter, bigger filter and smaller particles will be picked up. I will be using a large magnet on the outside of the filter to get any metal floating around in the oil as well. Currently, I am completely opening up the paper filter to examine it and wipe off the magnetic in the drain
plug
.
I use
Motul
5 - 40 here in FL. My understanding is that most engine damage is a result of cold starting an engine until such time as it warms up enough for the oil to flow freely. I don't know the time difference, but 0 weight oil and 5 weight oil, but 0 weight will flow sooner than 5 weight. I'm wondering if all of us should be using a 0 cold weight oil regardless of location? On the Joe Gibbs oil I think there's a different oil recommended for track use vs normal driving for those of us who don't have a dedicated track car.
I've used
Motul
5-40. When it became difficult to get and expensive, I changed to Total 5-40 "platinum" or some such???. Total owns
Motul
and their Euro grade oil is the same a
Motul
. I think it's better than
Mobil One
for our cars.
As far as Joe Gibbs goes, I buy it by the case online and it's about the same as other premium oils in cost. The reason I buy Joe Gibbs DT40 is because of statements like this one from the Flat-6 site:
"- Don't become caught up in anyone's ploy to dictate the engine oil thats best for your engine. Over time other oils have been developed that we have found to be more superior than what the mmanufacturer would have recommended when your car was new. We have a biased opinion on this topic, so please don't ask us for an oil recommendation! We have worked with Joe Gibbs Driven Racing Oil to develop an application specific offering of engine oil just for the
M96
/
M97 engine
. Its called "DT40", so just buy it and know that it solved many problems in the development of it. Since 2006 we have worked to develop the best engine oil for our engines and until 2012 this wasn't offered to the general public. Each and EVERY Flat 6 Innovations engine is required to utilize this oil. The controversy related to other oil recommendations is something my company avoids completely. When you buy a new
Porsche
, they recommend
Mobil 1
, but when you buy my engine I'll tell you to avoid that offering completely."
Maybe he gets a kick-back from Joe Gibbs? He certainly has the same sort of customer relations attitude as The Donald, but I think he knows how to build an engine.
I find some of this site's claims, and the inconvenience and high price of the work of Flat-6, are a bit hard to swallow but I don't think he'd recommend this oil so strongly if there wasn't some sort of good reason. All I can say is that I've seen no ill effects from using it. My car is in good enough shape to go to 200K miles, I think. I'm going to try. If it blows up? Well, I'll likely sell it to someone who wants a core for a race car or for a Flat 6 conversion. I think it's going to last quite a while longer. It runs as strong as ever...stronger than when I bought it with 16K miles in 2009.
You decide for yourself. I use DT40 most of the time.
:cheers:
'07
Cayman
2.7 5 spd with 160k. 50 miles each way every day year-round in northern NY so my car reaches operating temperature with 45 minutes to spare. I hate to feed an Oil Thread but I think I have a few relevant things to contribute. The first is (and I know this won't make me popular) while using
Mobil1
0-40 through the 30 something and 40k mark when I got my car, I found large amounts of white, waxy sludge under my fill
cap
and in the fill tube. This happened over several oil changes. I suspect it was due to the fill tube being so cold in Winter but it still bothered me. I switched to
Castrol Edge
5-40 and never saw it again. Two- I change my oil at 9,000 miles and cut open my filters every time. My filters have gotten cleaner over time. Three- My engine consumes no oil between changes. Adder- per
LN Engineering
/
IMS
advice that I read early-on, I never operate below 3,000 rpm's. C.
Agree 5-40 is better for all but the very coldest temps.
Don't agree that you need to avoid RPMs below 3,000 ALL the time. I try to stay above 2,000 and I avoid cold-walling the cylinders. That means giving it a lot of gas at low revs. That isn't good for any engine, except maybe diesels. Not sure about them.
Anyway, poking along at steady-state in traffic, 2,000 is OK. Switch down a gear or two if you need to put power down or if the terrain is very hilly. Not sure where in NY you are. Some bits are quite flat, like in N. Illinois here, and some are extremely not flat. When I head for the hills or the track, the lower gears get a workout. Driving steady-state 55 mph on flat terrain, it's just wasting fuel to run above 3,000 all the time.
If you push the gas and it feels wimpy, you should downshift, not push harder. I've heard this for motorcycle engines as well. Use the gears, ...but cruising is cruising.
:cheers:
My car is both my personal and track vehicle and for the first few years I had it I ran M1 0-40. But then a local builder suggested that if I use M1 it should be the 5-40 turbo diesel oil, which I've run during track seasons. Since neither my engine nor car are race-built, I've always thought of it as a street car, and assumed my engine would last forever. But I finally realized that, as I have been doing 7-9 D.E.s a season, running the crap out of it on R-compounds and, lately, slicks, it probably gets as much hard use as many club race cars. 2 builders, including Charles Navarro of RND Engines, told me they were surprised my engine hasn't blown already!
So now I'm planning on using a more robust oil, probably one of the Gibbs products. But, for those of us here who are tracking their cars, be advised that Navarro
does not
recommend DT40 for race engines. And I think that would also go for engines that are run like race engines. I think I'm going to try XP-7.
So...this car of yours. Is the engine stock? Stock
AOS
? You really ought to read Mr. Brown's description of his fateful track day experience. I think it's in the complaints section. Very typical. I'm surprised this hasn't happened to you. Sometimes it matters what track you drive on. R/A has a very long RH carrousel and a LH corner at the bottom of a long, downhill straight. Both extremely rough on the weaknesses that stock
Cayman
engines seem to have. I would say it's time to think about rebuilding that puppy and putting some safe-guards on it. If you blow it, usually it costs you a substantial core charge.
I have no affiliation with engine builders. I have seen these cars blow up though. ...So sad!
:beer
"
Is the engine stock? Stock AOS?"
Sorry, it is stock but not a Cayman. 997.1 3.8 X51. One reason I bought this car was that the X51 was less prone to blow than the Cayman 3.4. New stock AOS. Compression is still very good and oil analysis shows more aluminum than I'd like but nowhere near failure level.
"You really ought to read Mr. Brown's description of his fateful track day experience."
Where is it?
I run Road Atlanta, Barber, Memphis, and St. Louis regularly; been to COTA, Mid-Ohio, Sebring, NOLA, Indy, Putnam, Hallett, Bowling Green.
The purpose of my post was just to share that the top builders probably
do not
recommend DT40 for hard-pressed engines. FWIW I was able to order Gibbs oil from Autozone at list price, free store pickup, and got it the next day!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.