14 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH986 vs 987 cabin size & speedo oddity - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Test drove a 986 many moons ago
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I test drove a 986 many moons ago and after 5 minutes had to drive straight back to the dealer's.
986 vs 987 cabin size & speedo oddity - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Test drove a 986 many moons ago' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test drove a 986 many moons ago' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It is not the most confortable but good enough for me to use on high days and hoildays.
986 vs 987 cabin size & speedo oddity - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T022239Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm thinking of buying a Boxster for the occasional sprint, hillclimb, autosolo, track-day and so on (I've been doing all these things for a number of years in various vehicles). I drove a very nice 2002 986 2.7 yesterday (much money spent on all the things that go wrong with them; IMS, RMS, clutch, coil packs, suspension arms and so forth). Before I drove it, I thought "I'm going to buy this car". But ... it simply isn't big enough inside. I'm 6'2" and can't get far enough away from the controls for comfort. The wheel's too close to my knees (even with the seat all the way down and the wheel all the way up) and even with the seat rammed against the bulkhead, it was still too close.
So ... are 987s any bigger inside?
[ETA; Max budget £15K]
(Also, oddly, it had a kph (analogue) speedo, despite being (AFAIK) a UK car. (The digital bit was mph) Is that normal?)
987s have significantly more space. The seats are lower and the steering column adjusts on both fore and aft (while 986 only fore).
But don;t discard the 986 just yet! You should consider the "center console delete" as it removes the central cubby and will give you considerably more left leg room. I believe there are also options to modify the steering wheel boss along with fitting a smaller wheel. As a "track car" this shouldn't be an issue for you?
I think 987s are bigger inside. I used to have a 987.1 Boxster and also 6’2” and didn’t have the seat all the way back, was close to being all the way but not quite.
Twinfan said:
A mate of mine is 6'4" and found a 987 too small. With you being a touch shorter you may be OK based on what the other posters are saying
Cheers. I guess I'll just have to try one.
I'm 6'6 and used to own a 987 Cayman - I did only just fit, I found the Cayman quite a bit bigger than the Boxster headroom wise (roof up of course!!) - obviously they are the same length.
Guess it depends on where your height is.
I've had both and found the 987 (Cayman but I assume Boxster is the same) to be more spacious. I'm 6'2" and don't have the seat all the way back in a 987 whereas I do need to in a 986. The adjustment on the steering wheel is also better
I notice from your profile that you’ve competed in a TVR Chimaera, at a tad under 6’ I’ve found the cockpit of a 987.2 Cayman (manual and PDK versions) to be as, if not more, comfortable during competition than my previous TVR Griffith 500.
My last 986 was a 2001 2.7 and I couldn't get comfy (I'm only 5'10"). The steering wheel was really close to my knees and I used to get horrific back and hip problems. But for some reason I have none of the same issues with my new 3.2S.
I can't put my finger on why, maybe there's more adjustability in the steering wheel and the leather seats are a slightly different shape. It perhaps it's because the clutch isn't monumentally heavy on the new one. V odd.
Kevin-y9fs3 said:
My last 986 was a 2001 2.7 and I couldn't get comfy (I'm only 5'10"). The steering wheel was really close to my knees and I used to get horrific back and hip problems. But for some reason I have none of the same issues with my new 3.2S.
I test drove a 986 many moons ago and after 5 minutes had to drive straight back to the dealer's. It gave me terrible back-ache and I could feel it cutting the circulation off in my legs below the knee. Horrible. The 987 and 981s I have test driven do not give me the same problems, nor did the 996 Carrera I drove either. Weird...
I'm 6ft 1" and 17stone, and I fit into my 2000 986 3.2s. It is not the most confortable but good enough for me to use on high days and hoildays. I Would try a long drive just to see[when we are allowed]. the other post is right mine has no centre console so more space there. As a track car i would'nt dismiss it. I know people on here have faster cars but for me its a missile and unfortunatley I tend to run out of talent/courage before I run out of road.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.