27 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIs it just me, or is this 911 Turbo seriously cheap? - Page 2 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Use cars/porsche/911/2
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Is it just me, or is this 911 Turbo seriously cheap? - Page 2 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use cars/porsche/911/2' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use cars/porsche/911/2' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Is it just me, or is this 911 Turbo seriously cheap? - Page 2 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
27 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T084359Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Phunk said:
http://www.arnoldclark.com/used-cars/porsche/911/2...
As long as that mileage is genuine then that looks like a bargain!
Well it won't be around for long if it's genuine!
A few things are unusual with it. Colour coded sills and front splitter, which is non-standard.
And that rear spoiler isn't original either - there are no hydraulic rams in sight.
davek_964 said:
A few things are unusual with it. Colour coded sills and front splitter, which is non-standard.
And that rear spoiler isn't original either - there are no hydraulic rams in sight.
No, it looks exactly like a car with the original Aerokit: fixed biplane rear spoiler, larger front splitter, and colour coded sills. It seems to polarise opinion these days, but at least there isn't a £1000+ bill waiting in the wings when the hydraulic spoiler packs in :-)
There was a nice Aerokit-ed manual Turbo S at 911 Virgin too, went for £46k I believe with 61k miles on the clock. Even as a Turbo S owner with a vested interest in rising prices, that makes this car look like an absolute bargain.
Pete
What was the price? It has gone now as someone has reserved it.
Not used Harry Fairbairn for a long time, buy I'm told their standards have fallen dramatically since Arnold Clark took over.
pete said:
No, it looks exactly like a car with the original Aerokit: fixed biplane rear spoiler, larger front splitter, and colour coded sills. It seems to polarise opinion these days, but at least there isn't a £1000+ bill waiting in the wings when the hydraulic spoiler packs in :-)
There was a nice Aerokit-ed manual Turbo S at 911 Virgin too, went for £46k I believe with 61k miles on the clock. Even as a Turbo S owner with a vested interest in rising prices, that makes this car look like an absolute bargain.
Pete
OK, wasn't aware of that - I knew there was an aero-kit for the non-turbos but didn't realise there was a turbo version too.
Personally, having seen that I don't think I'm a fan.
Driver101 said:
What was the price? It has gone now as someone has reserved it.
Not used Harry Fairbairn for a long time, buy I'm told their standards have fallen dramatically since Arnold Clark took over.
It was up at £29,995
'Someone called and placed a deposit on the car before they could call you back. I have however made sure that should the person decide not to take the car then you are to receive first refusal if that is ok with you?'
Doh!!!
R8Steve said:
'Someone called and placed a deposit on the car before they could call you back. I have however made sure that should the person decide not to take the car then you are to receive first refusal if that is ok with you?'
Doh!!!
Word for word what I was told - they're lying to one of us....at least!
thegoose said:
R8Steve said:
'Someone called and placed a deposit on the car before they could call you back. I have however made sure that should the person decide not to take the car then you are to receive first refusal if that is ok with you?'
Doh!!!
Word for word what I was told - they're lying to one of us....at least!
Sorry guys it's true, I placed a depo there and then.
D16RR_Rich said:
jfp said:
Sorry guys it's true, I placed a depo there and then.
Congrats, can't see the advert.
Was is a 996 or 997 turbo?
Thank you mate. It's a 996, and looks to be a belter. I'm looking forward to getting it now....!
jfp said:
Thank you mate. It's a 996, and looks to be a belter. I'm looking forward to getting it now....!
I'm assuming you know the full history of that car...
DMC2 said:
jfp said:
Thank you mate. It's a 996, and looks to be a belter. I'm looking forward to getting it now....!
I'm assuming you know the full history of that car...
I know some - I'm awaiting more plus he mandatory inspection. I'm assuming you know more....?
jfp said:
DMC2 said:
jfp said:
Thank you mate. It's a 996, and looks to be a belter. I'm looking forward to getting it now....!
I'm assuming you know the full history of that car...
I know some - I'm awaiting more plus he mandatory inspection. I'm assuming you know more....?
Congrats Jon looks a belter and very very cheap.........
JapanRed said:
DMC2 said:
I'm assuming you know the full history of that car...
Is there something the OP should know?
Well if there is a hidden skeleton, Jon will sus it out, knows his stuff and a serious petrol head.
JapanRed said:
DMC2 said:
I'm assuming you know the full history of that car...
Is there something the OP should know?
An inspection will reveal all and thanks DMC2 for the catch up, lets wait and see but all being well this is a good straight car.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
