10 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHProactively replace AOS? - Page 1 - Boxster/Cayman - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Replace original aos
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Just DIY replaced the original AOS on my '02 2.7L with 180,000kms by which time, it had properly failed with the classic smoke bombs from a cold start.
Leading evidence: 'Replace original aos' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'early sign' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean mass air flow sensor' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I've changed the stat to a Hartech LT one, and when I asked my indy about the water pump he said that they usually give an audible warning when on the way out.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
On reflection, that was probably an early sign but there was no increased vacuum at the oil filler cap as far as I was concerned.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Then I started getting P1128/P1130 error codes and went on a wild goose chase cleaning the MAF and replacing the oil filler cap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If you opt to replace the AOS before its eventual failure then why not the fuel pump?
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Just DIY replaced the original AOS on my '02 2.7L with 180,000kms by which time, it had properly failed with the classic smoke bombs from a cold start.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I've changed the stat to a Hartech LT one, and when I asked my indy about the water pump he said that they usually give an audible warning when on the way out.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Then the cold start smoke bombs started by which time, I had the definitive failure symptom of considerable vacuum at the oil filler cap (when the engine was running, of course).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I did it as a preventative measure some time back on my 07 CS. From what i read they do give up about 60-70k miles and they are aren't that expensive, i even fitted it myself and it wasn't that hard to do.
I'd say replace it now. Under £100 if done DIY or perhaps £200 to have it done by someone in the UK?
Just DIY replaced the original AOS on my '02 2.7L with 180,000kms by which time, it had properly failed with the classic smoke bombs from a cold start.
A couple of years earlier, I began to notice rather unpleasant burnt hydrocarbon smells from a cold start (but little if anything the way of smoke). On reflection, that was probably an early sign but there was no increased vacuum at the oil filler cap as far as I was concerned.
Then I started getting P1128/P1130 error codes and went on a wild goose chase cleaning the MAF and replacing the oil filler cap. Then the cold start smoke bombs started by which time, I had the definitive failure symptom of considerable vacuum at the oil filler cap (when the engine was running, of course).
Perhaps your tech could slap a "slack tube manometer" on your car and test the crank case vacuum?
If all OK, you could leave it for another year or so and check again but, but you might end up spending more in diagnosis than the cost of preemptive replacement!
The downsides to letting it fail are that in extreme circumstances, it may be theoretically possible for a big slug of oil to be ingested leading to hydrolock. In more normal circumstances, any amount of oil that passes through to the intake will clart the intake with oil and it would clearly cost more time/money to clean it all out but it can be left dirty and then for a period of time thereafter, the residual oil will continue to pass through and you may get some more smoke for a while.
Also, when it properly fails and the crank case pressure is too high, it could lead to other vacuum problems and you don't really want a collapsed oil filler tube. I think I may have incorrectly refitted my oil filler tube (rear section) when I did my expansion tank and that may have been why I got some oil pooling on the right hand side of the block (under the oil filler tube, between the AOS and the alternator) an area that is tricky to clean up.
Thanks for the replies. I'm going to go ahead and have it replaced at the next service in a couple of months. The car is a keeper so don't mind doing stuff like this.
edc said:
Personally I would prioritise the waterpump and stat first.
I've changed the stat to a Hartech LT one, and when I asked my indy about the water pump he said that they usually give an audible warning when on the way out.
Trev450 said:
What are people's thoughts on replacing this ahead of it's eventual failure? Car is a 2007 CS with 51K miles.
Absent any signs of trouble from the AOS I'd leave it alone. As an aside, my 2002 Boxster averages 80K to 120K miles per AOS. At over 300K miles the engine is on its 3rd replacement AOS.
If you opt to replace the AOS before its eventual failure then why not the fuel pump? Water pump? Coolant tank? Wheel bearings? CV joints? Clutch? Radiators? Radiator fans? VarioCam solenoid/actuators? Window regulators? Door locks/latches? The list is endless.
Even if you replace the AOS you stil have to pay attention for even a new one can fail, either out of the box, or at any time.
Preemptive replacement is perhaps overkill, but in this case, it is a relatively inexpensive job/part (and quite satisfying to swap on a DIY basis).
In your experience, AOS failure has led you to have your car towed three times. That sounds rather inconvenient and preemptive replacement might have served you better?
"Three AOS's have come and gone. All 3 required I have the car towed to the nearest dealer for replacement. First failure tow was around 45 miles, the 2nd failure 90 miles, and the 3rd was just 10 miles."
Mogul said:
Preemptive replacement is perhaps overkill, but in this case, it is a relatively inexpensive job/part (and quite satisfying to swap on a DIY basis).
In your experience, AOS failure has led you to have your car towed three times. That sounds rather inconvenient and preemptive replacement might have served you better?
"Three AOS's have come and gone. All 3 required I have the car towed to the nearest dealer for replacement. First failure tow was around 45 miles, the 2nd failure 90 miles, and the 3rd was just 10 miles."
I also had the car towed for a fuel pump and a water pump. I managed to drive the car home when a VarioCam solenoid/actuator failed. Had a couple of batteries go bad over the years, too. One -- in my Turbo though not the Boxster -- failed after just 7 months.
So, preemptive replacement of what items and at what mileage/time?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.