14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBalancing Tyres - a new solution?
Leading reported evidence
Fill runflat tyres
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
So......Hydrogen inflated Mercury filled Runflat tyres that's what I want.
Leading evidence: 'Fill runflat tyres' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill runflat tyres' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
iirc the green stuff we used back then was called 'Slik'.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Static balancing takes more skill so it's not generally used by the Quick Fit type outlet.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T225432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
so............every time vehicle stops, lights, traffic etc the beads drop to bottom. How long then before beads constantly rolling around destroy inner tyre. Purpose built tyre you say, just how heavy would that have to be.
NEXT.....
Hmm :?:
About 30 years ago (oh cr*p, is it really?) I used to use some green goo (long forgotten the name of it tho') in my motorbike tyres that did this and also acted as a tyre seal if you ever got a puncture. Seemed to work OK & I used it for 50K miles without any problems, so it may work...
Hi
I do not know about the theoretical physics on this, but what a load of kak.
The green goo was nopt so bad for balancing, but there was similar stuff available that would harden somewhat and really fk things up.
I just do not see the bead thing working.
On the subject, I was once told that static wheel balancing of done correctly was better than dynamic, and that F1 car wheels were balanced that way.
Berni
Static balancing often gives more reliable results, particularly on wide wheels where the centre of the wheel is a long way from where the physical attachment to the hub is. Static balancing takes more skill so it's not generally used by the Quick Fit type outlet. My BBS LM wheels won't balance at all dynamically.
At a push I can see a liquid working for this purpose. Mercury, that's it....Mercury, heavy enough to not need vast amount and quick enough to react.
So......Hydrogen inflated Mercury filled Runflat tyres that's what I want.
NX120.
Are you sure it was 'slime' back in the 70s/80s ?
'slime' is still available.
iirc the green stuff we used back then was called 'Slik'.
T8
ps. What bikes did you have back then? I had an RD350 in '76 and a CB750F in '77.
I still think Slime sounds about right. I had a Velocette Thruxton in '76 (SHR 803) which I sold for an almost new Moto Guzzi Le Mans 850 Production Racer in early '78. Sold that in '81 with 50K+ miles on it to a mate who did long distance courier work on it. He sold it with 160K miles on it and it was still going strong :thumb: Where are you now LBW49S?
Never trusted Italian cars though :floor:
PS Am I sad for being able to remember my number plates? :dont know:
I know the difference between static (still) and dynamic (moving) but believed them to have different properties when balancing wheels.
ie the static balance took care of one form of vibration and the dynamic balance took care of another form of vibration.
Any good links on the subject chaps.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
