fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Big up for Exeter OPC again, v. Good Value I believe

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHBig up for Exeter OPC again, v. Good Value I believe

Leading reported evidence

Recommend by exeter and a few guys

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I have actually got the 997 shifter, rather than the 996 short shifter, as recommended by Exeter and a few guys on here.

Original post Read captured discussion
Big up for Exeter OPC again, v. Good Value I believe
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Recommend by exeter and a few guys' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend by exeter and a few guys' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Recommend by exeter and a few guys

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

I have actually got the 997 shifter, rather than the 996 short shifter, as recommended by Exeter and a few guys on here.

Original post Read captured discussion
Big up for Exeter OPC again, v. Good Value I believe
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T003124Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Supply & fit a 997 Short Shifter to my 996 turbo, UNDER £300 !!!! (£298 and few pence) You upcountry boys must have more money than sense :floor: Well, I thought it was very good value, especially with the wash n hoover to get the road salt off !!

POST 2Original post

I am thinking of having that modification to my C4S or the std 997 shifter. Were you really impressed when you drove it home? :?:

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I have actually got the 997 shifter, rather than the 996 short shifter, as recommended by Exeter and a few guys on here. What made me notice the difference was my previous C2 had the short shift and the turbo, when I got it didn't and longer throw on the gearstick was a 'detraction' The drive home after was much more comfortable and pleasing again. I would recommend it as in the great scheme of Porsche ownership, it's not that pricey.

POST 4Original post

Convinced me Pete, especially at that price, gonna give them a call tomorrow ...

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.