25 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHExperience On Fault Codes Appearing
Leading reported evidence
Test instead of the individual parts
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
That's why the system has to be tested instead of the individual parts to narrow it down to a specific part (s).
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm starting to feel like this is another wild goose chase like the one I just went through trying to fix the gas gauge needle that ended up with me spending almost $500, replacing parts that turned out to not be defective and the gauge still doesn't read full when I fill the tank.
Leading evidence: 'Test instead of the individual parts' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'result and you need' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill tank' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The shop I use wants to do another smoke test and basically start at the front of the car and test all the way back.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
are most likely the result and you need to look at the secondary air injection system.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
It's probably a stretch to think it had anything to do with it.:cheers:
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm starting to feel like this is another wild goose chase like the one I just went through trying to fix the gas gauge needle that ended up with me spending almost $500, replacing parts that turned out to not be defective and the gauge still doesn't read full when I fill the tank.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Fill tank
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm starting to feel like this is another wild goose chase like the one I just went through trying to fix the gas gauge needle that ended up with me spending almost $500, replacing parts that turned out to not be defective and the gauge still doesn't read full when I fill the tank.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
i sound like a broken record but ya gadda let some one look at the data stream ...or give it the shotgun fix...throw parts at it until its fixed....as for the fuel smell...recheck your work [it started after the repair] ...look at the protocall on codes,usually its fix first codes first.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
So after being told I need to replace almost the entire secondary air system, to the tune of $700, by one shop I took my ride to Flintworks in Campbell and in less than 20 minutes he found a broken 25 cent vacuum line in the SA valve under the intake plenum.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Unsuccessful attempt
The MAF was removed and cleaned and I replaced the K&N filter with an OEM filter and the intake box was cleaned out. The codes were cleared and I drove for a few days and the CEL came back on again this time with the following codes-P1124, P1126, P0410 and P1411.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Based on those one might say that the secondary air injection pump may have failed causing the system to run too rich, which would also bring a fault with the cat.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
it then [ecm] looks to see how active the sensors are [health] you need a scan tool that can run that test....basic stuff...the hoses that come and go to the pump,
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
25 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
Problem solved at a fraction of the other shops diagnosis for repair.
A few weeks ago I got a CEL on my '99
Boxster
and the following fault codes read out on the
OBDII reader
-P1124, P1126, P0130 and P0150. I took the car in and a smoke and liquid test was done to determine if any intake leaks were occurring and none were present. The MAF was removed and cleaned and I replaced the K&N filter with an OEM filter and the intake box was cleaned out. The codes were cleared and I drove for a few days and the CEL came back on again this time with the following codes-P1124, P1126, P0410 and P1411. The shop I use wants to do another smoke test and basically start at the front of the car and test all the way back. I'm starting to feel like this is another wild goose chase like the one I just went through trying to fix the gas gauge needle that ended up with me spending almost $500, replacing parts that turned out to not be defective and the gauge still doesn't read full when I fill the tank. Does anyone have any experience with these codes and what was done to solve the problem. Your help will save me several hundred dollars in another test that may or may not solve the problem.:cheers:
Cant help you on the codes but I had a fuel gauge problem once as well after the
battery
had died. The shop had to empty the tank and recalibrate it with a measured amount of fuel.
not about codes...but most often when gas gauge doesn't read full...check to see if gas tank is truly filled or not...could be problem with the gas tank vent system...not unusual on any older car
P0130 - Precat
O2 Sensor
Cyl 1-3
P0150 - Precat
O2 Sensor
Cyl 4-6
P1124 - O2 Sensing "Rich Threshold" Cyl 1-3
P1126 - O2 Sensing "Rich Threshold" Cyl 4-6
P0410 - Secondary Air Injection System "Signal Implausible" Cyl 1-3
P1411 - Secondary Air Injection System "Signal Implausible" Cyl 4-6
Afraid I can't help you with what this all means with respect to your car though . . .
Based on those one might say that the secondary air injection pump may have failed causing the system to run too rich, which would also bring a fault with the cat. Personally I'd start with consdering the first 4 codes as possibly being side affects of something else in the secondary air injection systems as they are codes from systems/sensors that come after the secondary air injection system.
After the third smoke test on my car one of the culprits were finally found a small $18 rubber hose part that is a part of the air/oil separator system. Cost for diagnosis, part and repair $266. I've learned a lesson to not assume anything about fault codes as they do not necessarily point to a specific part but an entire system. I still have to deal with the secondary air flow issue but for now my car is no longer running lean. Here's a pic of the part that had a small hole in it causing an intake leak. The part had to be cut off so that is why it appears in three sections, the leak was a pinhole.
extanker you seem to be the only one who knows that as it took two shops to find it. What's your read on secondary air system codes so I don't waste anymore money?:cheers:
the AIR is like a mini leaf blower,when you first start the car the ECM commands it to pump filtered fresh air into the
exhaust
system in from of the
o2 sensors
it then [ecm] looks to see how active the sensors are [health] you need a scan tool that can run that test....basic stuff...the hoses that come and go to the pump,
exhaust
check valves,. ive seen GM cars pop a cel for the AIR system when a K/N filter was put in but calm down after a few hundred miles....todays cars demand a very good scan tool and the car maker to provide the data...which po doesnt believe in....somewhere there should be a vac/emission decal showing the various componets of the AIR system
Thanks extanker, I understand how the system works and what the components are but was trying to narrow down the parts of it that typically fail but I guess there really is no way of doing that without testing the whole system. Would that be a vacuum test to se if the valves are closing and or the vacuum reservoir is cracked? I did have a K&N filter on the car for 7K mi. but have removed it for an OEM. It's probably a stretch to think it had anything to do with it.:cheers:
Anyone any ideas what makes an "implausable signal" is in regard to the secondary air injection pump, because I believe you can remove teh pump without any codes, so how is this code generated.
It's good they found the air link, but it sucks that such a cheap part costs so much, relatively, to fix, but that's the way it goes. That's why it's generally easier to be a tuning shop than a repair shop
My take, on the secondary air pump system, is it comes on at first start up to pump air into the cats so they heat up faster. The pump runs for about 20 secs. and the
O2 sensors
are reading the pre and post mixture in a set of parameters and that signal is sent back to the
ECU
. If the signal, from the
O2 sensors
, falls outside the parameters for a certain number of cycles (I believe two) then a fault code is sent to the
ECU
where it is stored and eventually will lead to a CEL. What makes it confusing, and expensive, is you don't know, even if the fault code is a secondary air system code, if it is the secondary air system or a bad
O2 sensor
. That's why the system has to be tested instead of the individual parts to narrow it down to a specific part (s). The system on my '99, although sophisticated for its time, is old technology today. I'm curious about the new
Boxster
's
ECU
system and if it is more part specific and less system generic.
i can fire up my scan tool and look to see what tests can be done...be advised po gives away data to few...do you have use of a hand held lab scope /scanner....AIR tests want the rate at which the
o2 sensors
react/some tester let you view all 4 sensors/crossover counts/min,max values
extanker thanks for the offer but I don't own a scan tool at this point as it is a violation of my lease where I live to work on cars so I'm pretty much at the mercy of shops. My concern now is that I now have a very strong gasoline smell coming from the back of the car at cold start up. God only knows what it is but at this point if it catches fire and burns up it might be a blessing.:beer:
Bad to the Box, I know what the secondary air system does, but was wondering if anyone knew exactly how an implausible signal is associated to the air pump itself.
If you're getting a strong smell of fuel on start up then as I said before the codes for the cats and
O2 sensors
are most likely the result and you need to look at the secondary air injection system.
i sound like a broken record but ya gadda let some one look at the data stream ...or give it the shotgun fix...throw parts at it until its fixed....as for the fuel smell...recheck your work [it started after the repair] ...look at the protocall on codes,usually its fix first codes first. what i mean is that the AIR codes are a result of problems of the first codes....tech books are a must and follow the diagnostic tree
So after being told I need to replace almost the entire secondary air system, to the tune of $700, by one shop I took my ride to Flintworks in Campbell and in less than 20 minutes he found a broken 25 cent vacuum line in the SA valve under the intake plenum. Problem solved at a fraction of the other shops diagnosis for repair. Thanks to everyone who replied to my post especially extanker with the links to the
Porsche
tree of understanding.:cheers::banana::beer::dance:
Cant find my codes
Taking advantage of this post I would like to know if anyone knows what the Engine Codes P0431 & P0421 come from?
The car seems to runs fine and has been catless before the EVO flash.
Thought that the flash would take care of this but it wasnt the case.
Someone???
Thanks
Jose
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.