8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHTech Mechanic in the Dallas Area
Leading reported evidence
Use john primarily
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use john primarily' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend most' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not exactly the repair where you want low bid, that will usually result in a much higher cost being paid later.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello all,
Can anybody help a newbie find an affordable Porsche Mechanic in the Dallas, DFW and surroundings areas?
I just got an porsche that needs an engine rebuilt. I already have the parts, but Im having trouble finding an affordable mechanic.
Any help its appreciated.
thanks a lot everyone.
Rebuilding a Porsche engine ? Not exactly the repair where you want low bid, that will usually result in a much higher cost being paid later.
Call John Gladwell at Boardwalk.
Im making some calls today... Im hoping to get a good engine with the 2 I have.lol
The one on the car got over heated and the block bent, and the other I got has the left casing cracked. So If the casing on the over heated one is good, than I think I have a good engine...
thanks a lot for all your help. Which you guys recommend most? RAC or Boardwalk in terms of pricing and warranty?
thanks
Does Todd work/rebuild street cars? I had the RAC (then Ruf) guys work on my car for years when I lived in Dallas. Great bunch. I also used John primarily when I got the GT3. So I can recommend both of them. Oh, and Todd did some work on my car (GT3) as well, but mostly "get it working so I can drive it on the track right now" kinda work.
-td
You might consider Danny Blaylock at Silent Automotive in Austin.
His rates are very reasonable and he has rebuilt numerous M96 engines.
He owns a shop in Austin, since he is deaf, he can be contacted via txt. [phone removed]
or send me an email
[email removed]
and I can get you in contact with him.
Mike
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
