7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHJRZ RS PRO fitment
Leading reported evidence
Use jrz pro rs suspension
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I have a 1999 996 C2, and, I have the option of buying a friends slightly used JRZ PRO RS suspension from his 2001 996 Turbo.
Leading evidence: 'Use jrz pro rs suspension' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend tarett)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
End links should work between the two, but that is also dependent on the front sway (recommended Tarett).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Looking for guidance that I cannot get from JRZ directly...
I have a 1999 996 C2, and, I have the option of buying a friends slightly used JRZ PRO RS suspension from his 2001 996 Turbo. Does anyone now if that will fit on my C2?
The short answer is going to be "no." Turbos and C2s have different mount points and geometry. I'm surprised you cannot get that clarification directly from the JRZ website or customer service.
yeah, I'm a bit disappointed that I have not heard back from JRZ. My shop (Goldcrest) indicated it may be the same dampers/springs, but the fitment might be way off. Hard to say, which is why I wanted JRZ to weigh in.
I personally have no direct experience with what you are asking. However, as a daily (hourly?) reader of this forum for several years I can tell you that this question comes up frequently in one form or another, and the experts have always come back with NO. The C2 suspension is quite different from the Turbo. Remember that the Turbo is All Wheel Drive and is a wide body, and is several hundred pounds heavier.
So I would actually be upset if the parts you are looking at actually correctly fit, AND WORKED, on a '99 C2.
Especially if I was a Turbo owner. LOL!
And as the owner of a '99 C2 I read ALL of the suspension mod stuff here, and nobody has to my knowlege properly grafted the Turbo suspension parts (or their equivalent upgrade/replacement parts) to a C2, or that probably would have become the default hot suspension upgrade here, and there would be no threads about the M030, M030 RoW, X-51, PSS9, etc. etc.
So, the answer from Erik RAS (COO) from JRZ is that the 996 turbo fitments will work with the C2; actually, he said they are the same damper. However, the front dampers from the turbo need to have the sleeve removed, and a new top hat/camber plate must be added for the different front mounting. End links should work between the two, but that is also dependent on the front sway (recommended Tarett). The rear dampers are a straight replacement. Lastly, since the 996 turbo is heavier than the C2, new springs may be in order to achieve balance.
shocking huh
PS, It is painful to see all the guys with 997 selling Motons and JRZ cheap, and no one is selling the 996 variant!
