42 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCheck out this 996
Leading reported evidence
Run into this ad while browsing cl
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run into this ad while browsing cl' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean but they seemed' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This one is actually puzzling in the fact that the exterior and interior seems to be clean but they seemed to have left the engine bay untouched.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Don't know too many people willing to dump that kind of change into an older depreciating car.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
42 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Im reminded of an old saying when looking at that interior: "just because it can be done doesnt mean it should be done"! Lol
But the rest is pretty cool
Skip.
Aftermarket backrest TVs always means deferred maintenance, without fail. It's like a Ferrari with allseasons on; you know exactly the kind of person that would do that.
Seems to be the classic case of more money than taste. There's a lot I like about the car but he did go overboard on some things which I don't care for.
He's local and I can check it out if someone's SERIOUSLY interested.
no way I would buy that thing.......It says "the back view camera is not working".
Maybe the doors are airbrakes since the parachute pack would obscure the license plate.
It's a 2000 cab, don't think that's making any statements about money. From my experience it's people with no money that think that 20"+ wheels or tvs for the backseats are the way to demonstrate wealth...
It's a 2000 cab that has as much modifications almost as much as the car's worth. It certainly does make a statement about money(and possibly sanity too). Don't know too many people willing to dump that kind of change into an older depreciating car.
that kind of spending falls in the category of "stupid" money.
He turned a nice car into a customized, personalized, abortion. And $37,500?????
NAFC....
All that and an engine bay as dirty as a construction workers pickup. Seriously why do people do for sale adds with dirty cars, i really really dont get it.
This one is actually puzzling in the fact that the exterior and interior seems to be clean but they seemed to have left the engine bay untouched. I don't really see the logic...
