23 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGT3 I want this...
Leading reported evidence
Run 80mph
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm sure the aid of the electronics was helping, but that guy driving is no stranger to pitching a car sideways running 80mph.
Leading evidence: 'Run 80mph' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 80mph' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
No doubt that you have to have wheel time to run a car like he was.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I have to go to the dealer to get a new key programmed...so good time for test drives.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The way that thing goes down the road it would use two sets of tires a day.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
23 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/2000x1460/img_2771_f7b91c27a9cca235abbd9e7b7ab53baf74ee376c.jpg
This is why the '04 GT3 is the only one I'd own. It will actually force you to drive it instead of seeing how much it can compensate for ones lack of ability.
No doubt that you have to have wheel time to run a car like he was. I'm sure the aid of the electronics was helping, but that guy driving is no stranger to pitching a car sideways running 80mph.
Yes. '04 is an MT with no traction control. They are a driver's car. And I'm not saying you can't learn skills on a newer GT3 but I will say that you spend a lot of money to isolate yourself from the road. Personally, the rawer the feel the more I love it. And this is coming from a track perspective. For DD, I think the TT is a better choice than than the GT3.
I understand where all you guys are coming from for sure. The older gt3 would be amazing, the new one would be even more amazing compared to my 996. 143k wow, second hand mark would be all I could do when I'm 80 I guess. But the early non assisted turbo is my next car , not soon, still working on turning my 996 into the best in can be. I agree he was playing with the car tossing it around, you can see him loading the front suspension with his tap break technique right before He tosses the car.
I feel the same If I had either one also. I'm about to drop big money on a suspension setup on my 996 that will sit in the garage, and go get milk occasionally,
Trail braking is important on any 911, but especially on a newer stock GT3. If you don't use the brake to rotate the rear end they will just push right through and not turn.
But if you want something you can throw into a corner, slide around, and have the computer do all of the small adjustments needed to get you through it, there is nothing more fun than a Cayman.
You can turn them off but the car is still going to be helping you some, but not as much. I drove a Cayman and a GT3 back to back at the Vegas Dream Racing track. My times were quicker in the GT3 but I came away in love with the Cayman.
Yeah I bet! Mid-engine would be hard to beat. I wouldn't mind a nanny that just keeps me from killing me or the car just not one that drives it for me. I remember the PCA magazine discussion on modern nannies made me sick to my stomach a little! Do you know what year the Cayman engine became less susceptible to modes of failure. Not sure about the 718 versions, but we'll see. I have to go to the dealer to get a new key programmed...so good time for test drives.
I have a 981S Cayman. Yes - you can turn the nannies off......but......
With nannies ON you can hang the rear out about 40+ degrees. With the nannies OFF - hang it out as much as you want until the front starts to drift. It won't let you slide both ends, and will turn itself back on. You can feel it dial down power until "order" is restored. Then you have to manually turn it off again.
