16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMy 2002 C2, 3.6 from Ireland...opinions wanted.
Leading reported evidence
Use either of these
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use either of these' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use either of these' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All,
I'd like to introduce my car, My car is a 2002 3.6 C2.
I love the look of the RPM Tecknik CSR cars but based in Ireland, I may need to do some of the work myself. Design911 in the UK have a good deal on a Wavetrac LSD and a LWFW on their site. Has anyone used either of these ?
More below
My car has had the following work done
Full engine rebuild
200 call sports cats and top gear exhausts
Rebuilt Calipers and OPC Sport Pads , Goodridge brake lines
RSS engine mounts
Koni Special Active Shocks, new droplinks and coffin arms
Full service , include coils and plugs
Next on the list are
GT3 Style reclining carbon seats
997 GT3 type shifter
Third radiator install, low temp thermostat and Evans waterless coolant
Brake and suspension overhaul
FVD oil sump
Manifold
LWFW and sport clutch
LSD
Eibach adjustable control arms
Eibach hollow anti roll bars
Polybushings throughout
Wishlist consists of
Ohlins Coilovers
Carbon GT3 bumper and rear ducktail
Viscosity is too high, heat capacity is too low, this gives engine temps much higher than without it. With the car's marginal cooling system you're going to crack heads. Remember there's many feet of pipeline between the radiators and the engine.
Why would you want to use it? What's the claimed benefit? I have heard of it used in large, low speed Diesels with some possible advantages, the conditions are not representative of passenger car engines and certainly not where the engine is a $15,000 gamble.
I'm lost here, Porsche and BMW both use this for 24hr races. Hartech use it, RPM Tecknik CSR use it, most race teams use it. Are we talking about the same product ?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
