19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWill I be needing a flywheel?
Leading reported evidence
Replace rms
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I will tell you that, under the "man to man" advice and thoughts of a very exp engine builder, I was told off the record "clean the bitch up and run it."
Leading evidence: 'Replace rms' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean bitch up' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I will tell you that, under the "man to man" advice and thoughts of a very exp engine builder, I was told off the record "clean the bitch up and run it."
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You will save 1 hour labor for cleaning and 8 hours labor replacing the flywheel later.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Clean bitch up
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I will tell you that, under the "man to man" advice and thoughts of a very exp engine builder, I was told off the record "clean the bitch up and run it."
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T075545Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
02 c2 with about 56k miles is going in for surgery next week for a clutch job . Will also be doing ims upgrade. Do you guys think I'll need a new flywheel with that milage.
Funny you should ask this. I am in the same boat. Seems that most of the flywheels this shop has seen have been out of spec per the Porsche tests and they usually end up replacing them while they are in there.
I asked if I could come take a look at it once they get it out just to see for myself. It's not that I don't trust the shop but it is my first time using them and I don't have anything to go on.
Keeping my fingers crossed that mine looks good but I guess we'll see.
I just did a clutch job in March at 60k. My flywheel was fine after cleaning. I would plan on keeping your car in the shop for more than 1 day. Rent a car or whatever you need to do. Once the car is apart, have the flywheel inspected and make the decision then.
I would replace it anyway. At that mileage it cannot be really good even if it looks OK. The expense of getting there is already paid for and having a new clutch together with a new flywheel will assure a smooth operation for a long time.
Besides, it is not that expensive. I think it was 700 at Suncoast when I was doing my clutch last year.
I think it would be a good idea to change it.
The problem isn't with how the surface looks. It is with how far you can turn the halves how much spring tension there is and and if they return to to the start position.
I replaced the RMS on my 2003 @ 32k mi. The flywheel was a little loose but within spec then. I am amassing the parts to do LN IMSB, clutch pack, flywheel, AOS this winter @ ~ 50k mi.
the only way to be sure is to check it when you have it out.
Porsche TSB 1360 8/02 assessment of DMF�
The twist below must be carried out by hand and without any tools. Twist distance to be measured at the external diameter of the DMF
Can the DMF be twisted by approx.. 15mm to both left and right, and does it then return to approx. its initial position? If yes = good
Can DMF be twisted beyond 15mm (excessive turn) without a noticeable increase in the spring force? Yes = bad, no = good
You Tube
Building LUK DMF
You Tube
In theory a flywheel should last much longer than 56K. Unless the disk has been worn down so much it damages or burns the flywheel. That being said it does seem that the dual mass flywheels seem to have more problems and a shorter life than single mass flywheels.
I count myself among the lucky. I found a brand new OEM Dual Mass Flywheel in 2005 on eBay for
$67
, still in the box. I was the only one that bid and got it shipped at that price. It sat under my desk for 2+ years. But when my clutch started slipping at about 46,000 miles my indy said I need a new flywheel so I saved some big bucks.
Well someone else drove my car from 28k miles and I have no idea how they treated the car. I'm curious how one could cause the pressure plate to break with driving style, dumping the clutch or something stupid? I do push it hard sometimes but never abuse it. Most definitely never dump the clutch trying to burnout since I'm in a 4S.
Has about 33k on it now when the clutch went.
Hoping to get a look at the flywheel today.
well. I didnt change mine at 106K. The car now has 140K.
I just cleaned mine up very well. I will tell you that, under the "man to man" advice and thoughts of a very exp engine builder, I was told off the record "clean the bitch up and run it."
I think you are OK to run the one you have,
I cleaned mine up with a gray sanding scrubby pad
Well I went to the shop yesterday to check out my flywheel and it looks pretty bad to me. I've seen some folks say that you can machine a DMF, but these guys said they don't recommend it. Also it seemed like it felt slow to return to the right position when twisting it but I am no expert. Maybe I'll keep the old one around for emergencies.
It is possible they just wanted to sell me a new marked up flywheel but I didn't want to risk it and went ahead with the new one. I am a paranoid hypochondriac and would be constantly worried if I didn't replace it.
I was the same way about the IMS. I couldn't enjoy the car until it was upgraded.
The decision is obvious - replace it. You will save 1 hour labor for cleaning and 8 hours labor replacing the flywheel later.
I think you made a good decision.
Please post pics/video of checking your old one.
As previously mentioned I could have changed mine, a little loose but just within spec, @ about the same mileage as yours, but I did not. It has been in the back of my mind since. That is one reason I will be changing it when I do the LN IMSB.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.