7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHey - saw someone getting a ticket in DC on
Leading reported evidence
Repair a $250 speeding ticket is
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As we have good enough jobs to afford a $20k+ car and the Porsche tax for maintenance and repair, a $250 speeding ticket is but a minor inconvenience for most of us.
Leading evidence: 'Repair a $250 speeding ticket is' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair a $250 speeding ticket is' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Repair a $250 speeding ticket is
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
As we have good enough jobs to afford a $20k+ car and the Porsche tax for maintenance and repair, a $250 speeding ticket is but a minor inconvenience for most of us.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
How in the heck did that happen? I lived there for 3 year and couldnt never even get close to going the speed limit.
If it was someone here, Go check in OT, thats where they will be crying like a little girl asking how to bend the truth and get out of their mistake of breaking the law.
Really, how fast can you go on Connecticut in rush hour? Maybe in the area towards Wheaton but not the Bethesda/DC area. Don't they also have a speed camera there as well?
It was a couple blocks before the Van Ness metro stop, the 4200 block if you heading towards town. There are several speed cameras (guilty of a few tickets
) maybe a mile or so prior to getting to that point.
speed cameras SUCK *****.... their has got to be a poop hold to get rid of those farking things. Cant you over expose the plate with halogen bulbs or something. Black light something...
2 cars going 22 mph > the limit -- the porsche will get the ticket every time. Ticketing a Porsche is a red jelly bean for the cops. My cousin is a cop and he revealed it to me. They think everyone who has a Porsche is rich and spoined even though the book value of my car is less that the Book value of a 2 year old Avalon.
Rich? Not necessarily. Spoiled? Well, yes!!
It's all relative. As we have good enough jobs to afford a $20k+ car and the Porsche tax for maintenance and repair, a $250 speeding ticket is but a minor inconvenience for most of us. To someone struggling to keep a $500 car running and living paycheck-to-paycheck, a $250 speeding ticket is devastating, especially if their insurance rates go up. Still sucks, but yeah, we can afford it.
Buddy of mine fought a baseless car-profiling reckless driving ticket once and won; he was going speed limit, but the cop felt he was driving too close to a line of parked cars. The cop was getting frustrated when the judge didn't like his reasoning, and dismissed the case after the cop exclaimed, "But your honor,
he was driving a red Corvette!!
"
IMHO, profiling sports cars is OK, but they have it all backwards. Follow my line of reasoning here: The law already takes driving conditions into account. They realize that tires and cars perform worse under wet conditions and snowy conditions, and stopping distances increase, etc, and will ticket people for going too fast for conditions, even if they're slower than the posted speed limit. The law accepts that conditions dictate what a safe speed is. Therefore, they should likewise raise the limit for conditions that can be driven safely! If I can stop my Porsche from 100mph in the same space a jacked-up pickup can at 55mph, and probably have far more maneuvering at that speed, why shouldn't I be allowed to legally do that?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
