14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH0-60 time
Leading reported evidence
Test times around 4.7
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I've seen magazine test times around 4.7 for C2 coupe.
Leading evidence: 'Test times around 4.7' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test times around 4.7' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I had a 6.06 on a 99' C2 with 4 people in it
(results via Ipod Touch Dynolicious)
wasnt much interested in it after a couple runs... turns out (like we all know) its not a 1/4 mile car...
:-)
Ed
3 kids, ages 9-10-11 between 70-100 lbs ea
4 adults is ONLY for really LONG trips LMAO!!
Like I read in another thread, at least this car is good for something!! hahaha
E
I've seen magazine test times around 4.7 for C2 coupe.
Such as this:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._overview.html
Cab is heavier of course, so add a fraction.
You can search on this, maybe you've heard of "The Google?"
Yup, you called it. After that I had the rear wheel lips rolled, then I added 10" wide wheels and 295 tires in the rear for additional traction. After I got it back home I remembered it is a front wheel drive!
I would like to believe there is another Porsche in my future, but probably not.... unless I land a much higher paying job in the future. The last couple of years have been very lean relative to the prior five years.
I've seen 4.6secs tested in EVO and either Car and Driver or Road and Track - one of those two big mags. That's for a Coupe though, a cab is a few tics slower.
All depends on the driver. If you take off like a grandma and don't induce wheel spin, you'll be in the mid 5 sec range.
